Dejan Lovren

[McDermotX]

Knows his stuff that lad.... He probably would have given him the 3 yellows and his marching orders.

That's specially reserved for a super-dooper sending off.

[baitman]

[Big-Red-Ed]

I feel so sorry for the lad. He's still a bit wick but has improved a lot under klopp. Might be just a sore one but not out too long. Anyway Marty Mayhem and co will cope.

[rudedog]

I feel so sorry for the lad. He's still a bit wick but has improved a lot under klopp. Might be just a sore one but not out too long. Anyway Marty Mayhem and co will cope.

A bit wick Haven't heard that expression since I lived in County Down.

[Big-Red-Ed]

I. Definitely a local one that.

[Slinky Skills]

Hope Lovren is ok, he's grown on me of late and he's doing the basics well and it's good to see that he does seemingly have a brain.

[Gibbo]

I don't think it was a red either.

Did someone say Sahko was back next game? If so its not a huge huge loss. Think Can struggles at CB though.

[G]

Yes I'm his biggest critic but when he keeps it simple I'd have him in the team, ahead of Skrtel when Sakho is back.

[Chris]

Croat on RAWK said 2-3 weeks so should be back in time for when Sakho next goes down. Marty must have some special powers, all his partners are better but never stay fit!

[BobTheCharmer]

That's because it was a blatant red

You start letting tackles (follow throughs) like that go and we will start to need some pretty big squads. We were guilty of a few as well, but that one was bad.

Lovren was on oxygen FFS. Even if he didn't mean it, it was reckless, and therefor a red.

It wasn't. Guys on match of the day didn't think it was either. Not every tackle like that results in injuries, far from it. Most injuries come from nothing tackles, blocks or muscle pulls. The squads would have to be no bigger if tackles like that were allowed more often. Squads were 14 or so not so long ago and the tackles would fly in.

Just because he was on oxygen should have **** all bearing on whether it should of been red. It's like those cunts complaining that Luke shaws injury was caused by a bad tackle. It wasn't it was a blinding tackle. Nowt wrong at all.

[Buzzo]

Well, I'm not sure if Alan Shearer and Chris Ramsay agreeing with you strengthens your case all that much

Anyway, we could go over this for ever. I think it was a red, you don't. It's moot now, no red was given.

[Mattshark]

It wasn't. Guys on match of the day didn't think it was either. Not every tackle like that results in injuries, far from it. Most injuries come from nothing tackles, blocks or muscle pulls. The squads would have to be no bigger if tackles like that were allowed more often. Squads were 14 or so not so long ago and the tackles would fly in.

Just because he was on oxygen should have **** all bearing on whether it should of been red. It's like those cunts complaining that Luke shaws injury was caused by a bad tackle. It wasn't it was a blinding tackle. Nowt wrong at all.

Except it was dangerous and out of control.

[Le Chef]

Didnt Spearing get a red for a similar tackle at Fulham a few years ago under Kenny, took the ball bit the follow through was deemed dangerous.

As an aside, a little earlier, Milner had a bit on Gardner, might have been a wee but of payback

[frank the tank]

Croat on RAWK said 2-3 weeks so should be back in time for when Sakho next goes down. Marty must have some special powers, all his partners are better but never stay fit!

[Camble]

Remember Spearing's red card against Fulham a few years ago? His was similar in that he got the ball but he followed through with unnecessary and over aggressive force. I personally don't think it was a red but I wouldn't have been surprised to see it given.

It's bizarre because had it been against Coutinho or a small attacker I think it would have seemed worse than against a big CB.