Everton vs Liverpool - Premier League (20/21 - Game 5)

[Fivex]

You have to go with the infield decision. Then, let the ref look at it. If he feels there is evidence to make him change his mind then do so, if not you stay with on field decision.

You still may get the odd shocker, but ultimately there is accountability (as there used to be if ref made a bad decision). Referee MUST have final say.

It’s not complicated.

This Coote fella came from the championship and was investigated a few years ago and suspended over something or other, details on that are pretty unclear but it's obvious he's not up to the job.

[ric.williams]

You have to go with the infield decision. Then, let the ref look at it. If he feels there is evidence to make him change his mind then do so, if not you stay with on field decision.

You still may get the odd shocker, but ultimately there is accountability (as there used to be if ref made a bad decision). Referee MUST have final say.

It’s not complicated.

great post. so obvious really

we're back to the not using the screens again

[ric.williams]

Yep, so the point remains why is the VAR ref making absolute guesses with a winning goal moments from the full time whistle?

buzzo nailed it

[Roboklopp]

Yes Buzzo.

Am not even angry anymore tbh. Just don’t see the point.

[poorscousertommy]

I'm ****ing livid after that. Two shocking VAR decisions. The Premier League have to come out and explain the offside - give us the image that shows it.

We played well though and Thiago is ****ing class!

[Buzzo]

If I’ve posted ‘that’s how they do it in Rugby’ once on here I have a million times. Rugby Union has been using VAR for years. They have decisions where you have footage being rolled backward and forward to make split decisions. But. Unless there is clear video evidence to the contrary then the on field decision remains.

It’s really that easy.

Are there times where there are debatable decisions? Yes. But we will always have those and if those protocols are followed then the decision making process is clear and easy to understand.

[BG1973]

What the **** is the point if offside VAR is a human decision in the end. If its that close its onside.

Absolute joke.

[ric.williams]

If I’ve posted ‘that’s how they do it in Rugby’ once on here I have a million times. Rugby Union has been using VAR for years. They have decisions where you have footage being rolled backward and forward to make split decisions. But. Unless there is clear video evidence to the contrary then the on field decision remains.

It’s really that easy.

Are there times where there are debatable decisions? Yes. But we will always have those and if those protocols are followed then the decision making process is clear.

Its amazing how poor the implementation of VAR in the PL has been

[Fredo]

Amidst all of this, i have a fear Virgil will be out for the season.

[banditos]

The lack of scrutiny for Pickfords challenge on VVD is unbelievable. The play was live at the time and he mows him down with a career wrecking tackle. And what do the VAR fkrs do, hide their cowardly arses behind a marginal offside. Fkn disgrace! Even Tim Cahill was grilling Dermot Gallagher on it!

[Buzzo]

Pretty much universal from pundits panel (about 6 of them) that Pickford should be off and goal should have stood.

[Mark79]

This Coote fella came from the championship and was investigated a few years ago and suspended over something or other, details on that are pretty unclear but it's obvious he's not up to the job.

Same on field referee who ****ed us over in the 1-1 at home to Burnley at the end of last season.

And had Robbo swearing his head off at him in disbelief.

[Mark79]

And it seems Coote was also the VAR at Old Trafford last season.

That seals it then. Corrupt cunt.

[ChesterDave]

Wasn't there a auto filter on the forum where a particular word changed to "I'm a little teapot"?

Can we have something similar for David Coote?

[Mr Pink]

We're far too slick for them. We'll cruise this.

Hate these kinda retarded posts!!

No offense, I’m not saying that you are a retard- just saying that what you write is consistent with something a retard would write...