Raheem Sterling

[Muddled]

I'm fairly confident we wouldn't sell to Manchester United anyway. I think it's just a ploy to start a bidding war.

[BigChief]

Unlike most on here, I was ecstatic we were selling Torres to Chelsea for £50m. Not only were we getting free money but we were weakening a plastic club, albeit temporarily. Double whammy.

Sterling to Utd for £50m is a-ok with me too.

[Vermilion]

Damn it! I keep forgetting Sterling is so **** we need to get rid of him to improve ourselves and make one of our rivals worse!

If top players look at LFC right now, look at who's left in the last couple of seasons, who we're signing now, and then evaluates our finishing position, would they come here with confidence?

I think signing these 'top notch' players everyone wants us to will be highly difficult.

[DannyMan2006]

Damn it! I keep forgetting Sterling is so **** we need to get rid of him to improve ourselves and make one of our rivals worse!

I'm not saying he's ****, just that he isn't worth the fees mentioned. I'd also rather keep him, there is guarantee we would spend the money on two players worth having.

But I wouldn't lose sleep if he left. Main reason being he isn't a great winger and I think that's where Rodgers would play him. He's a number ten.

[Kenneth]

Damn it! I keep forgetting Sterling is so **** we need to get rid of him to improve ourselves and make one of our rivals worse!

If top players look at LFC right now, look at who's left in the last couple of seasons, who we're signing now, and then evaluates our finishing position, would they come here with confidence?

I think signing these 'top notch' players everyone wants us to will be highly difficult.

The conversation was about where he ends up going rather than whether selling him is a good or bad idea.

[bonzai]

[EwarWoo]

The conversation was about where he ends up going rather than whether selling him is a good or bad idea.

Exactly. Let's slate him for 1 theoretical thing at a time.

[Kenneth]

I don't really get it. People seem resigned to him going, and, on this page at least, people aren't really bothered where. Not because he's **** but because it's obvious already that he wants to leave and we'll get a decent fee for him.

[EwarWoo]

I'm not resigned to any thing. Will see what happens first.

[Norbs]

Like he gives a ****. And no, even if they offer £100m, tell them to ****. right. off.

Gabriel Heinze.

They can **** off.

For £100m and we're ripping them off. Well up for a bit of that

Let's face it, he's going to be hated wherever he goes. The intensity of it will be great to see

[danperkins]

Don't care where he goes, just sell him to the highest bidder & be done with him.

[redmike65]

The S*n running with a story which was then rehashed in the Independent (that paper has become such a bargain bin Guardian) says 50m offer from City.

[Exiled_red]

The S*n running with a story which was then rehashed in the Independent (that paper has become such a bargain bin Guardian) says 50m offer from City.

I'd take that.

But given the source(s) it is almost certainly BS

[redmike65]

All systems go!

John Cross ✔
@johncrossmirror

Man City launch £30m bid to sign Liverpool star Raheem Sterling #mcfc #lfc http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football
/transfer-news/manchester-city-make-30million-raheem-5831966 …
10:39 PM - 5 Jun 2015

[danperkins]

Another £20 million please man city