Originally posted by Muddled
View Post
I was thinking along the same lines. £49m is an odd fee.
-
Moral victory for Man City
I was thinking along the same lines. £49m is an odd fee.
-
I wonder if Sterling was asked by City to put in a transfer request, so that we would accept a slightly lower fee, and they will just make it up on wages or a signing bonus - that way it looks like they win, but we walk away with a higher overall figure?Originally posted by Bender View PostMoral victory for Man CityComment
-
-
great use of the [square brackets] to focus on the the latest news
removing all the weak links makes us stronger
too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all.Comment
-
-
-
We just need to make sure the money is well invested.The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.Comment
-
That Poll in the Telegraph.
Is Raheem Sterling worth £49m
Yes, of course 9%
No, don't be daft 91%Comment
-
Originally posted by Bender View PostMoral victory for Man City
Klopp on LFC vs MUFC (March 9th 2016) - "This is why I love football. This is why we watched it when we were young. I can still not have enough of it."
Always, keep your face to the sun, and shadows will fall behind you.Comment
-
Laugh my arse off if he fails the medical and is forced to take the long walk of shame back here. Realistically I'd cry though because Id like that 49mill, but I'd definitely start off by laughing.Comment
-
He's a good player but **** off is he worth that kind of money, how much did we get for Suarez?Comment
-
Christian Benteke here we comeKurtangled in the McFadden thread 16/01/08
Comment
-
-
No other team in the world would have paid £49m for Sterling. Bonkers money!
A Utd fan that made his mark at Liverpool and went on to play for City.
Good riddance to him. We'll be a better team without him.Another MASSIVE game
Comment
-
Jamie Carragher@Carra23
22 minutes ago
Raheem Sterling is a very good young player but he has not yet hit the heights of an Owen, Rooney, Fowler or Giggs at this stage of his career so there's no doubt 49 million is a great deal for Liverpool. The price is not something Raheem can control & the debate will rage about whether he's worth it or not but the price is more to do with nationality & potential, what he can become rather than what he is right now, but if he can take Man City to more titles & get close to CL success they'll deem it worth it.
It's now time for Raheem to do what he does best play football & show the Premier League the Sterling who was described as "The best young player in Europe" just over a year ago & you couldn't argue that fact at the time. I think he has the potential to be a star & one of the leading lights in the national team for years to come as we saw in the Italy game at the WC in Brazil.
From Liverpool's point of view it's a great fee & credit to FSG who have showed great strength in these situations since they come to the club which sends a message to other clubs & current players. Surely in the future though they will want to halt the exodus of Lfc's top players moving on.Comment
Comment