Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jordan Henderson

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Charly
    replied
    Perhaps Henderson can engage with their culture and try to moderate things to some degree. Someone has to risk sticking their neck out to change things.

    I remember football stadiums in this country used to not be as welcoming to people of different skin colours or nationalities. But things changed over time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Exiled_red
    replied
    Originally posted by Mark79 View Post
    Henderson is entitled to move on in search of more minutes elsewhere.

    But his choice of destination is rightly going to draw criticism and disappointment given that he spoke out against Qatar and put himself up as a poster boy for Rainbow Laces and promoted inclusiveness for LGBTQ+ fans.
    This is where I'm at with this, I would have liked Henderson to stay and have played the Milner role for a few years. He is clearly not at the level he once was but he has been a great captain and a good player for us, but I believe still has something to offer. I can understand the desire to leave for more game time and I think had he been stepping down a level e.g. Going to a championship club or something in light of what he had done for the club we might have been willing to cancel his contract and forego a fee or at least take a lower fee than we might be looking for now to allow it. But a seeming desire to go to Saudi seems like it is mainly motivated by one thing - money, yes you imagine he will get the game time he wants as well but he could also have got that other places as well. I can understand the desire to go somewhere that you can get paid 3 or 4 times your current salary for the same job is a once in a lifetime opportunity. It just seems like the destination and the way that this has been handled ends his 'role' as and LGBTQ+ ambassador and taints his legacy at the club which I for one am sad about.

    Leave a comment:


  • labourRed
    replied
    Originally posted by Mark79 View Post
    Henderson is entitled to move on in search of more minutes elsewhere.

    But his choice of destination is rightly going to draw criticism and disappointment given that he spoke out against Qatar and put himself up as a poster boy for Rainbow Laces and promoted inclusiveness for LGBTQ+ fans.
    Of course he is. To be honest like a lot of our players i don't love him nor hate him - the club is the only entity i really care about. Most of the players are there for the gig, i'd probably include Henderson in that - i don't know him personally so can't be sure - nor do i care.

    The club is what i care about, Henderson is going to offer little going to offer little going forward. So the best outcome for me is we get a modest fee of 10-20m, free up some wages and move forward. If anything it could herald a dawn of being a little bit more ruthless with players (although we're told Henderson instigated this move and Klopp offered his approval).

    Leave a comment:


  • Rigadon
    replied
    Originally posted by Fierce View Post
    Or, the club have told him his game time is likely to be reduced this year, given the signings we've made; and he has decided he would like to play as much as possible because he doesn't have much of a career left

    Nah, can't be true. Burn shirts
    Far too logical and balanced.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fierce
    replied
    Originally posted by Mark79 View Post
    Henderson is entitled to move on in search of more minutes elsewhere.

    But his choice of destination is rightly going to draw criticism and disappointment given that he spoke out against Qatar and put himself up as a poster boy for Rainbow Laces and promoted inclusiveness for LGBTQ+ fans.
    Reason? Get out
    Last edited by Fierce; 18-07-23, 10:39 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mark79
    replied
    Henderson is entitled to move on in search of more minutes elsewhere.

    But his choice of destination is rightly going to draw criticism and disappointment given that he spoke out against Qatar and put himself up as a poster boy for Rainbow Laces and promoted inclusiveness for LGBTQ+ fans.

    Leave a comment:


  • RedReet
    replied
    Originally posted by SB View Post
    Millie would have been told similar a few years ago but he still did the right thing by the Club, and on considerably less money with us too.
    There is one teeny weeny difference though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rigadon
    replied
    Originally posted by Kenneth View Post
    That’s pretty dumb tbh.
    It’s obviously struck a chord. Hence your flippant response.

    Leave a comment:


  • SB
    replied
    Originally posted by Fierce View Post
    Or, the club have told him his game time is likely to be reduced this year, given the signings we've made; and he has decided he would like to play as much as possible because he doesn't have much of a career left

    Nah, can't be true. Burn shirts
    Millie would have been told similar a few years ago but he still did the right thing by the Club, and on considerably less money with us too.

    Leave a comment:


  • rudedog
    replied
    Originally posted by Kenneth View Post
    They are not counter positions involving hypocrisy. Firstly, this is all of his making, whatever the ultimate outcome. He is the club captain and has a very lucrative contract with LFC and he intends to end it. He’s currently being criticised for trying to leave his contract with us agains the wishes of the club to join a sport washing project for financial gain (prick). If it doesn’t happen because his chosen destination are unable to afford the modest fee, he will be criticised for having instigated and unviable transfer and undermining his own position going forward with fans, the club and teammates (prick). Both perfectly valid criticisms.

    And it’s not just his ‘haters’ that will be critical of the outcome. And the only thing funny about him unilaterally undermining the clubs plans will be the unnecessary self inflicted damage to his legacy with the club and its fan base.
    Quite a few blanks being filled in there.

    Leave a comment:


  • RedReet
    replied
    Originally posted by Kenneth View Post
    They are not counter positions involving hypocrisy. Firstly, this is all of his making, whatever the ultimate outcome. He is the club captain and has a very lucrative contract with LFC and he intends to end it. He’s currently being criticised for trying to leave his contract with us agains the wishes of the club to join a sport washing project for financial gain (prick). If it doesn’t happen because his chosen destination are unable to afford the modest fee, he will be criticised for having instigated and unviable transfer and undermining his own position going forward with fans, the club and teammates (prick). Both perfectly valid criticisms.

    And it’s not just his ‘haters’ that will be critical of the outcome. And the only thing funny about him unilaterally undermining the clubs plans will be the unnecessary self inflicted damage to his legacy with the club and its fan base.
    But for some, it wouldn't have mattered where he was going or what the circumstances, he'd be damned if he did and damned if he didn't.

    It is unfortunate that he has chosen to go down this path and unfortunate that he will have tarnished his reputation with many who weren't 'haters' and have genuine reason to be upset.

    But from my online (and even real life) experience, there are a lot more people fall into the first category they will criticise Henderson about issues they genuinely don't give a sh*t about and they too will be most vocal with their criticism if he does end up staying. For that reason, I will find it amusing to see them get upset, without worrying myself about the deeper impacts on the club, which is a different conversation all together.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fierce
    replied
    Or, the club have told him his game time is likely to be reduced this year, given the signings we've made; and he has decided he would like to play as much as possible because he doesn't have much of a career left

    Nah, can't be true. Burn shirts

    Leave a comment:


  • Kenneth
    replied
    Originally posted by RedReet View Post
    It is true though.

    If Henderson does leave, his biggest critics will be those who would have happily gave him away for free a few weeks ago and hilariously 'driven him to the airport' themselves. These new human rights campaigners will be outraged by his decision to go there.

    The only thing that could possibly upset them more, is if the deal falls through and he ends up staying, like Rigadon says. Will be pretty funny though.
    They are not counter positions involving hypocrisy. Firstly, this is all of his making, whatever the ultimate outcome. He is the club captain and has a very lucrative contract with LFC and he intends to end it. He’s currently being criticised for trying to leave his contract with us agains the wishes of the club to join a sport washing project for financial gain (prick). If it doesn’t happen because his chosen destination are unable to afford the modest fee, he will be criticised for having instigated and unviable transfer and undermining his own position going forward with fans, the club and teammates (prick). Both perfectly valid criticisms.

    And it’s not just his ‘haters’ that will be critical of the outcome. And the only thing funny about him unilaterally undermining the clubs plans will be the unnecessary self inflicted damage to his legacy with the club and its fan base.

    Leave a comment:


  • labourRed
    replied
    Originally posted by RedReet View Post
    It is true though.

    If Henderson does leave, his biggest critics will be those who would have happily gave him away for free a few weeks ago and hilariously 'driven him to the airport' themselves. These new human rights campaigners will be outraged by his decision to go there.

    The only thing that could possibly upset them more, is if the deal falls through and he ends up staying, like Rigadon says. Will be pretty funny though.
    Oh, come on.

    Leave a comment:


  • RedReet
    replied
    Originally posted by Kenneth View Post
    That’s pretty dumb tbh.
    It is true though.

    If Henderson does leave, his biggest critics will be those who would have happily gave him away for free a few weeks ago and hilariously 'driven him to the airport' themselves. These new human rights campaigners will be outraged by his decision to go there.

    The only thing that could possibly upset them more, is if the deal falls through and he ends up staying, like Rigadon says. Will be pretty funny though.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X