Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Brendan Rodgers

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1,691
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 220 270 310 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 330 370 420 820 1320 1691 template Next
    #4786
    Originally posted by -V- View Post
    Criticizing his team selections/signings is one thing but making fun of his every comment and having a go at him for saying positive things is pathetic. Thats things some posters on here are guilty of and should seriously go support ****ing chelsea or some other plastic ****e
    the bit where rodgers said we werent 24 points behind on quality was a bit wierd.

    So let me get this straight we have the quality in the team now but not the results. So who's fault is that.
    [B]Sir Isaac Newton knew the universal law of karma - any action has its equal and opposite reaction.[B]

    Comment

      #4787
      Originally posted by el matador View Post
      funny to think that the team at the top of the table at the end of the season cant be considered to be the best in the league.
      Er, did anyone actually say that?
      .
      Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



      May the Lord bless this post.

      Comment

        #4788
        Originally posted by el matador View Post
        im agreeing dan.

        funny to think that the team at the top of the table at the end of the season cant be considered to be the best in the league.

        its like playing cards and **** wins.
        sorry wasn't sure

        Comment

          #4789
          Neil Young's true identity revealed:

          Comment

            #4790
            So can I just get this straight in my head?
            All working class people live on council estates?
            The title goes to the team with the most points?
            And if we get the most points we get the title?
            And the table doesn't lie about who sits on top of it?
            And if we get one point more than last year we have clearly and indisputably improved?

            That's blown my mind.

            Glass Half Full

            Comment

              #4791
              Originally posted by el matador View Post
              the bit where rodgers said we werent 24 points behind on quality was a bit wierd.

              So let me get this straight we have the quality in the team now but not the results. So who's fault is that.
              Its pretty straight forward really. We have quality players coming in but guys have have barely played a run of games together whereas they have a settled team full of experience. Brendan has been here half a season and has loads of new players to bed into the team, clearly that will take time.

              Borini has been injured and Sturridge only arrived last week. Sterling and Suso are still kids so you can't expect them to get us to the top of the league straight away can you?

              He has quality players and he is builing a good team. You can't say the quality hasn't shown through in game like Man City, Wigan, Sunderland, West Ham, Fulham etc

              The team has put in lots of good performances. We outplayed Man City and Man Utd at home this season but never got full points due to individual errors and **** refereeing. The quality is clearly their and is coming together slowly but surely. Everyone needs to stop bitching and get behind the manager. We are getting better week on week and we have just got 2 clever strikers added to the line up so I can see us going on a very good run till end of season. Come sunday night I believe the gap between us and 4th will only be 6 points

              Comment

                #4792
                Originally posted by el matador View Post
                im agreeing dan.

                funny to think that the team at the top of the table at the end of the season cant be considered to be the best in the league.

                its like playing cards and **** wins.
                As an example Barcelona didn't win the league last season and they were the best team in the league IMO.
                *Except Michael, who died.

                Comment

                  #4793
                  But they wasn't, they finished second?
                  The times they are a changin'.

                  Comment

                    #4794
                    Is there really only one Brendan Rodgers in the world?

                    Comment

                      #4795
                      Originally posted by Alex View Post
                      As an example Barcelona didn't win the league last season and they were the best team in the league IMO.
                      maybe the best footballing team but not the best team overall because Madrid finished top.

                      I know where you're coming from but in my eyes the team that finishes top is the best team in the league.

                      If people handed points out for playing good football arsenal would have won the league 50 times by now. As it stands they play good attractive football but have won jack ****.
                      [B]Sir Isaac Newton knew the universal law of karma - any action has its equal and opposite reaction.[B]

                      Comment

                        #4796
                        Originally posted by -V- View Post
                        Its pretty straight forward really. We have quality players coming in but guys have have barely played a run of games together whereas they have a settled team full of experience. Brendan has been here half a season and has loads of new players to bed into the team, clearly that will take time.

                        Borini has been injured and Sturridge only arrived last week. Sterling and Suso are still kids so you can't expect them to get us to the top of the league straight away can you?

                        He has quality players and he is builing a good team. You can't say the quality hasn't shown through in game like Man City, Wigan, Sunderland, West Ham, Fulham etc

                        The team has put in lots of good performances. We outplayed Man City and Man Utd at home this season but never got full points due to individual errors and **** refereeing. The quality is clearly their and is coming together slowly but surely. Everyone needs to stop bitching and get behind the manager. We are getting better week on week and we have just got 2 clever strikers added to the line up so I can see us going on a very good run till end of season. Come sunday night I believe the gap between us and 4th will only be 6 points
                        I hope you're right bro.
                        [B]Sir Isaac Newton knew the universal law of karma - any action has its equal and opposite reaction.[B]

                        Comment

                          #4797
                          Arsenal dont play attractive football anymore. That's a myth. Is nice. But it's nothing compared to 5 years ago.

                          Anyway, I think Barca were the better team overall. From the games I watched they played better. Madrid may have won the league because of a myriad of reasons. Sending offs, injuries, fixture congestion. There are mitigating factors in everything. So to say the winner is the best team is too simplistic IMO. I think it's fair to say that Chelsea were not the best team in Europe last season but they still won the Champions League. How does that work based on the winner being the best logic?
                          *Except Michael, who died.

                          Comment

                            #4798
                            Arsenal dont play attractive football anymore. That's a myth. Is nice. But it's nothing compared to 5 years ago.

                            Anyway, I think Barca were the better team overall. From the games I watched they played better. Madrid may have won the league because of a myriad of reasons. Sending offs, injuries, fixture congestion. There are mitigating factors in everything. So to say the winner is the best team is too simplistic IMO. I think it's fair to say that Chelsea were not the best team in Europe last season but they still won the Champions League. How does that work based on the winner being the best logic?
                            *Except Michael, who died.

                            Comment

                              #4799
                              If you win you're the best.

                              You might not have the best squad, or players, or manager but if you beat everyone else you're the best.
                              [B]Sir Isaac Newton knew the universal law of karma - any action has its equal and opposite reaction.[B]

                              Comment

                                #4800
                                Originally posted by el matador View Post
                                If you win you're the best.

                                You might not have the best squad, or players, or manager but if you beat everyone else you're the best.
                                Chelsea were the 5th best in England. So I don't buy into that at all. Sorry.
                                *Except Michael, who died.

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 220 270 310 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 330 370 420 820 1320 1691 template Next
                                Working...
                                X