England's Summer Of Cricket against New Zealand and AUSTRALIA!

[Hollowman]

There seemed more than enough to turn that round. I can understand being in two minds on the first replay with the slight noise, but the reverse angle cleared all that up. Not sure what was going though their mind on that one.

[Harv]

OH **** OF YOU CHEATING ****ING SCUMMY CUNTS!!!!!

Absolute ****ing disgraceful decision. Get rid of the reviews they ****s dont know what the ****s going on.

****ing cunts

[EwarWoo]

Wonder what Harv makes of that 1.

EDIT:/// I shoulda refreshed before hitting post.

TBH was a bloody awful call but. It diminishes the game for both sides.

[Yozza]

Didn't see it as I'm at work but something must be wrong if even the BBC website is saying it was never out

[Shaggy]

Let's face it Australia need all the help they can get so it's tough to see them getting a howler like that. I want there to be a bit of competition ffs!

[Hollowman]

No hotspot, no noise so a clear reason to overturn it.

No. Hotspot can miss one in ten feathers, especially with a slower delivery. As with the Agar decision, when the other technologies suggest he is out, they can be taken above hotspot. Obviously in this particular instance the decision was horrible, but hotspot shouldn't be taken as gospel. You'll only make a Harv of yourself taking that line.

[Sarb]

And people wonder why India aren't in favour of DRS. Isn't as fool proof as people go on about

[Harv]

Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuuu

[Shaggy]

Simon Wilde @swildecricket
Australia have also lost a review as a result of that cock-up. Their DRS score for the series now stands at Right 2 Wrong 12

[Shaggy]

And people wonder why India aren't in favour of DRS. Isn't as fool proof as people go on about

No one said it is fool proof but it has clearly and demonstrably improved on the number of poor decisions being made. India's stance is nonsensical.

[dww]

[in response to the stats about review success]

Although in this instance that isn't really their fault by the sounds of things.

[Hollowman]

And people wonder why India aren't in favour of DRS. Isn't as fool proof as people go on about

This was clear human error though. The system is fine and has been proven beyond question to increase the number of correct decisions. There isn't even a debate about that. I don;t get this argument that the system has to be 100% or not used at all. That's crazy.

[Harv]

****ing ******s!!!!!!!!!!

[PTP]

i've not seen it - i've only read what is on here and the BBC live text

but i'm 100% convinced he was out

[Chazza]

No. Hotspot can miss one in ten feathers, especially with a slower delivery. As with the Agar decision, when the other technologies suggest he is out, they can be taken above hotspot. Obviously in this particular instance the decision was horrible, but hotspot shouldn't be taken as gospel. You'll only make a Harv of yourself taking that line.

And nobody wants that.

My point was more that the 3rd umpire's must be told to consider hotspot and noise, in this case there was neither so even without the visible gap I would guess that they have enough evidence to overturn the on field decision.