Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Andy Carroll - Best Striker in the World

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Tee View Post
    And lets not forget how long it took a certain Peter Crouch to get settled.

    Yes it is frustrating, but from the odd glimpses of AC's real potential we have already seen, I am certainly expecting him to come good and show us the player he really is.
    "Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob Paisley

    Comment


      Originally posted by MrNice View Post
      I wish people would just get over his ****ing price tag, its done, the money has been spent, the best thing we all can do now is get behind the lad and encourage him and whilst the rest of the world might be getting on his back including the so caled fans of his own cities football club, the Liverpool faithful should be able to show him why we beleive our club is special otherwise we will turn into Chelsea with just a sea of cunts if we are not careful
      People will always bang on about it, it's done now and we need to get on with it it's not going to make a blind bit of difference now.

      Carroll is a good young player and under the guidance of those around him his career is only going to move forward and improve.

      People will soon stop once he starts banging them in which like Crouch is only a matter of time.
      Klopp on LFC vs MUFC (March 9th 2016) - "This is why I love football. This is why we watched it when we were young. I can still not have enough of it."


      Always, keep your face to the sun, and shadows will fall behind you.

      Comment


        Originally posted by truefan999 View Post
        Again you are linking the Torres and the Carroll buys. Why?

        Just because Chelsea paid £50m didn't mean we had to spend money like a drunken sailor on shore leave.

        You argument seems to be that its ok because we are not the biggest idiots in the room because there is someone even thicker than us. This does not hold water.

        Why not try to be the smartest person in the room....


        JWH explains the deal.

        Are you now questioning the owners of the club?

        Comment


          Craig - Truefan

          stop antagonising each other

          Thanks.

          Comment


            Originally posted by rcasemore View Post
            http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/st...-deal'?cc=5739

            JWH explains the deal.

            Are you now questioning the owners of the club?

            Yes! If they agreed to pay £35million for Andy Carroll then yes that decision needs to be questioned. Once Newcastle started asking for that kind of silly money we should have looked at other options.

            Comment


              If the owners are willing to pay, and we have the money. I really dont see a problem? Its not like buying Andy Carroll effected other purchases did it?
              *Except Michael, who died.

              Comment


                Errrr yes it did.

                1:It means that less money was available for other transfers
                2:It means that all fees we have paid since have been vastly inflated unless dealing with players with little left on their contract.
                3:The owners spent our club money on this and not their own. Thus far they have not spent any of their own money on transfers

                Comment


                  Originally posted by truefan999 View Post
                  Errrr yes it did.

                  1:It means that less money was available for other transfers
                  2:It means that all fees we have paid since have been vastly inflated unless dealing with players with little left on their contract.
                  3:The owners spent our club money on this and not their own. Thus far they have not spent any of their own money on transfers
                  But they did spend a sum paying off the majority of our debts and acquiring the club.
                  James Philip Milner Fanclub #1

                  Curtis Julian Jones Fanclub #1

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by truefan999 View Post
                    Errrr yes it did.

                    1:It means that less money was available for other transfers You assume
                    2:It means that all fees we have paid since have been vastly inflated unless dealing with players with little left on their contract. You assume
                    3:The owners spent our club money on this and not their own. Thus far they have not spent any of their own money on transfers Proof?
                    Tell me one incident where we didnt go for a player because we couldn't afford him? We got all of our targets, and the ones we supposedly lost out on were for footballing reasons.
                    *Except Michael, who died.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by truefan999 View Post
                      Errrr yes it did.

                      1:It means that less money was available for other transfers
                      2:It means that all fees we have paid since have been vastly inflated unless dealing with players with little left on their contract.
                      3:The owners spent our club money on this and not their own. Thus far they have not spent any of their own money on transfers
                      This is a scandal.

                      They must be taken outside and shot to death until they admit the errors of their ways. It's the only solution.
                      .
                      Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                      May the Lord bless this post.

                      Comment


                        You're talking about truefan999 and who else?
                        Hello mert.

                        Comment


                          To be on the safe side, everybody.
                          .
                          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                          May the Lord bless this post.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Rich View Post
                            But they did spend a sum paying off the majority of our debts and acquiring the club.
                            I never said that they did not. They bought the club and hence getting rid of most of our debts.

                            But that was a capital purchase and they got a bargain at the price that they paid.

                            But I do not think that we shall see them dipping into their own pockets to fund spending sprees. We will spend what we earn.

                            I do not have a problem with that. But that means wasting £35m is even more of a crime

                            Comment


                              Indeed. A crime of the very greatest magnitude.

                              .
                              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                              May the Lord bless this post.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by truefan999 View Post
                                I never said that they did not. They bought the club and hence getting rid of most of our debts.

                                But that was a capital purchase and they got a bargain at the price that they paid.

                                But I do not think that we shall see them dipping into their own pockets to fund spending sprees. We will spend what we earn.

                                I do not have a problem with that. But that means wasting £35m is even more of a crime
                                There you go. You see, you cant go around telling people what you think might happen is a fact.
                                *Except Michael, who died.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X