Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Racism in Football

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Johnny H View Post
    as is the word 'black' when used in the same context.
    I'm asking why the P word is racist, whereas black, Turk, Brit, whatever else isn't?
    You know why it's racist. It's never used in a positive manner, and always used by racists in Britain.

    Playing devil's advocate here, seeing that you didn't/don't consider it racist, do you use the term? If so, what sort of reaction do you get when you say it to people you presume are from Pakistan?

    Comment


      Originally posted by CJ View Post
      i dont hear the word alot but the one that shocked me most was an Indian bloke i worked with saying it.

      whilst he probably was using to mean people from Pakistan I dont think it was meant as a compliment.
      Indian people have it in them to be racist too, CJ. Did you ask him why he used it and try to draw a comparison?

      Comment


        Originally posted by Frenchie View Post
        Alf Garnet
        alf garnett was 1 giant pisstake poking fun at the racists.

        He was designed to become a figure of ridicule in the hope that it would make racism seem ridiculous. It was very political and forward for its time. They just didn't count on how dumb the average racist is and it backfired.

        Warran Mitchell himself was a 2nd generation Russian Jewish immigrant.

        So whilst in a way the show is racist, there's much more to it.

        Comment


          Originally posted by EwarWoo View Post
          alf garnett was 1 giant pisstake poking fun at the racists.

          He was designed to become a figure of ridicule in the hope that it would make racism seem ridiculous. It was very political and forward for its time. They just didn't count on how dumb the average racist is and it backfired.

          Warran Mitchell himself was a 2nd generation Russian Jewish immigrant.

          So whilst in a way the show is racist, there's much more to it.
          really? i never heard that before
          _____________________________________

          Weak willed, Wank or do they have a masterplan?

          Think we have the answer..Slot!!

          Comment


            anyone remember this...

            love thy neighbour...

            removing all the weak links makes us stronger

            too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Norbs View Post
              You know why it's racist. It's never used in a positive manner, and always used by racists in Britain.

              Playing devil's advocate here, seeing that you didn't/don't consider it racist, do you use the term? If so, what sort of reaction do you get when you say it to people you presume are from Pakistan?
              i presume that you haven't read all of my posts on this matter.
              I did not say that I don't consider it racist, what I said, playing Devil's advocate, was how come it is deemed racist when it could be used to describe a Pakistani, and qualified my question by including other words that are entirely innocent eg black.
              maybe this should be in the discussion forum.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Johnny H View Post
                maybe this should be in the discussion forum.
                racism thread, seperate from the footy racist issues.
                removing all the weak links makes us stronger

                too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all.

                Comment


                  Eh? Is the n word not used to describe a black person? It's just that it happens to be an obnoxious racist way of doing so, much like P*** can be to South Asians. You haven't been able to fundamentally differentiate the two words from that pov.
                  Like blood on iron

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Johnny H View Post
                    i presume that you haven't read all of my posts on this matter.
                    I did not say that I don't consider it racist, what I said, playing Devil's advocate, was how come it is deemed racist when it could be used to describe a Pakistani, and qualified my question by including other words that are entirely innocent eg black.
                    maybe this should be in the discussion forum.
                    The closest parallel I can think of is like 'Spic' is to Hispanic people. Neither term is defendable, both are derogatory and therefore racist slurs designed to offend the person on the receiving end.

                    Comment


                      It's not really short for Pakistani either. Ok, words change over time but in this country at least it's long had a history as a derogative and, to my knowledge, has never really been used affectionately.
                      .
                      Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                      May the Lord bless this post.

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                        It's not really short for Pakistani either. Ok, words change over time but in this country at least it's long had a history as a derogative and, to my knowledge, has never really been used affectionately.
                        It has. It was actually in the Oxford dictionary in the 1960's. It became a racial term over time
                        Last edited by saj; 14-02-13, 08:20 PM.
                        My kebab comes with chilli sauce

                        Comment




                          Paul Elliott: FA accepts resignation after racism row

                          Football Association ambassador Paul Elliott has resigned from all roles representing the organisation following reports of a racism row.

                          The anti-racism campaigner, 48, was part of the FA's judicial panel and a nominated member of Uefa committees.

                          Ex-Celtic and Chelsea defender Elliott has also left his role at anti-discrimination body Kick It Out.

                          FA chairman David Bernstein said: "The use of discriminatory language is unacceptable, regardless of context."

                          He added: "It has made Paul's position untenable.

                          "I wish to thank Paul for his dedicated and unstinting work, particularly in the area of anti-racism.

                          "I am saddened by this turn of events and it is with regret that we accept Paul's resignation."

                          A report in the Sun newspaper alleged Elliott had a dispute by text message over a business venture with former Charlton player Richard Rufus.
                          Elliott was reported to have used a derogatory term.

                          A statement from Elliott read: "Earlier this week, a former friend and business colleague, made public a text message I sent him, in which I used a term which is widely known as being derogatory to my own community.

                          "I regret using it; it is inappropriate and not part of my everyday vocabulary. As an advocate of high-standards of public behaviour, and integrity in public life, I know the use of this word sends out mixed messages and contradicts my position as a Kick It Out trustee.

                          "I will continue to be active in other projects in what I believe to be a true and just cause."

                          Earlier this month, Elliott became the first black footballer to collect a CBE at Buckingham Palace for his services to equality and diversity in football.

                          Elliott, whose career was curtailed by injury in 1992, has been a trustee of Kick It Out since 1996.


                          The same Paul Elliott who said this....

                          Suárez has to understand things that may be acceptable in his native country may not necessarily be acceptable here

                          Comment


                            Hypocritical *******. Someone needs to remind him if that.
                            "Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob Paisley

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by saj View Post
                              It has. It was actually in the Oxford dictionary in the 1960's. It became a racial term over time
                              Really? I'd very much like to see that entry.

                              I'd also like to know how it fits chronologically with UK population changes involving people of south Asian origin. I'd guess it predates the large-scale immigration from some parts of south Asia at least (e.g. perhaps East Pakistan/Bangladesh) and people of south Asian origin from elsewhere (e.g. definitely from Uganda).

                              And it's fifty years ago. I mean, maybe the N-word has been used without pejorative intent at some time in the past - given its etymology I'd imagine that's likely enough - but no one in Great Britain hears it that way now or is ignorant of its connotations.
                              .
                              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                              May the Lord bless this post.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Chazza View Post
                                The same Paul Elliott who said this....

                                Suárez has to understand things that may be acceptable in his native country may not necessarily be acceptable here
                                He was right about that though. And his actions are consistent with it.
                                .
                                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                                May the Lord bless this post.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X