Liverpool debt dispute forces Americans to consider sale

[CAD]

Who is the biggest con man in this deal?

Questions
1. Royal Bank of Scotland
Why they offer a short term loan to G&H and not to David Moores?
Does it mean our CEO, Rick Parry does not know where to source for financing? He has absolutely nothing to do with this.

2. Rick Parry
Which side is he on? Is he on the Boards side who try to block the move to place debt on Liverpool's book? Or he is the one who knew all along this would happen? He's with Moores. Who else?

Who prepared the contracts for Klinsman? who cares?

If G&H managed to sell for 80 million profit, David Moores & previous shareholders should kick themselves for believing in Rick Parry. The club were undervalued by Rick Parry. Rick Parry did NOT set the value for LFC!

3. Who leaks the information that DIC planned to sell after 7 years?
Prime Suspects: Rick Parry
He has a lot to gain as he can keep his job by sabotaging DIC bid. If he did this it is because Moores asked him to imo.

4. Is all those promises documented?
Build new stadium, no debt on Liverpool's book and etc. This is really a joke if it is all lip service.

I really can't see Rick Parry as an innocent party of all these saga.

Perhaps, he is the greatest betrayal of Liverpool FC. He is in the know of all these issues. He never blew the whistles (unlike the Marscherano deal). He obviously loves his salary more than Liverpool FC.

Parry, Please leave with the American.

People giving Parry way too much credit. He doesn't have that kind of pull. He is a rook at best in this chess game.

[Roboklopp]

****ing hell, this is like torture isnt it?

CAn we not hire someone to assasinate the Septics & have done with it?

[Skillz]

Who is the biggest con man in this deal?

Questions
1. Royal Bank of Scotland
Why they offer a short term loan to G&H and not to David Moores?
Does it mean our CEO, Rick Parry does not know where to source for financing?

Moores has no other income streams and had no cred as a businessman = lack in confidence

2. Rick Parry
Which side is he on? Is he on the Boards side who try to block the move to place debt on Liverpool's book? Or he is the one who knew all along this would happen?

Who knows. I suspect he is doing his best to rectify this massive blunder.

Who prepared the contracts for Klinsman? KOP Ltd Lawyers

If G&H managed to sell for 80 million profit, David Moores & previous shareholders should kick themselves for believing in Rick Parry. The club were undervalued by Rick Parry. If true (and i agree) why did DIC dick around

3. Who leaks the information that DIC planned to sell after 7 years?
Prime Suspects: Rick Parry
He has a lot to gain as he can keep his job by sabotaging DIC bid.

Possibly, most likely on what we know which is little. I think it could of been Gillett and Hicks. Something we more than likely will never know.

4. Is all those promises documented?
Build new stadium, no debt on Liverpool's book and etc. This is really a joke if it is all lip service. Agree if true

I really can't see Rick Parry as an innocent party of all these saga.

He's definitely not innocent. It's the degree's of guilt that is unknown.

Perhaps, he is the greatest betrayal of Liverpool FC. He is in the know of all these issues. He never blew the whistles (unlike the Marscherano deal). He obviously loves his salary more than Liverpool FC.

No, that would be Tom Hicks

Parry, Please leave with the American.

Good questions. What a mess we are in

[Skillz]

It looks like it all depends on Gillett. He isn't that rich so I doubt that he can come up with a £75m cash security.

Hang on AF, the way i have read this it is a combination of cash up front and assets secured against the loan as previously reported (bar the assets).

You really need to learn to stick to transfer targets and tribull links.

[Craig_H]

Basically DIC is the investment arm for Sheik Mohammed. Whilst the man is an undoubted winner (anyone who follows horse racing will know all about him) I still believe they will essentially want LFC to make money.

If money was no object and it was all about glory why didn't they simply offer another £30 or £40m and blow G&H out of the water. Lets face it, it would hardly break the bank for them.

I remember when it looked like DIC would buy LFC, listening to Brough Scott, a well known and respected racing journalist. He has very close links to Sheik mohammed and set up the Racing Post paper with him. He said that whilst DIC would want LFC to be no.1, it would be have to be financially viable. There's no way he thought the Sheik would simply throw money at the problem.

Because they felt they had an agreement which Moores went back on - it was a matter of trust and principle for them. These things are incredibly highly valued in the Arab world.

[AFII]

Because they felt they had an agreement which Moores went back on - it was a matter of trust and principle for them. These things are incredibly highly valued in the Arab world.

[AFII]

Hang on AF, the way i have read this it is a combination of cash up front and assets secured against the loan as previously reported (bar the assets).

You really need to learn to stick to transfer targets and tribull links.

[Skillz]

Because they felt they had an agreement which Moores went back on - it was a matter of trust and principle for them. These things are incredibly highly valued in the Arab world.

Too right. Used to be a Liverpool trait aswell.

Just kidding mate.

[kris90210]

Im surprised that Gillett or Hicks haven't come out to say something on this yet

[CAD]

Heja Sverige

[tomasjj]

Because they felt they had an agreement which Moores went back on - it was a matter of trust and principle for them. These things are incredibly highly valued in the Arab world.

Ah, but according to what we read here and there, Moores was obliged to consider the other rival bid, down to comittments to the shareholders.

I reckon DIC got the escape plan they needed as they weren't prepared to up their bid.

The bummer that might have pissed them off was not informing DIC that LFC was gonna have a meeting with other bidders, when apparently DIC had asked to be kept in the loop.

If what I have read is correct....

[tomasjj]

Heja Sverige

No way!

[Roboklopp]

What concerns me is that even if DIC are "waiting in the wings" as has been fairly widely speculated, how long will they wait give the Septics at the club & what will the cost be to us in the meantime?

As well as our dignity, will we also lose our manager & key players who have come to Pool specifically for him (Xabi & Monsters)? How far will the Yanks have run us into the ground before DIC step in?

Of course you could argue that DIC wont want to have the club too damaged before they take over, but you could also say that that will decrease the valuation price, allowing them to buy the club on the cheap.

However if Rafa is still around at this stage, I do not see why Ansari (who is a fan at least in name) would see fit to replace him immediately without giving him any funding whatsoever if DIC are gonna invest in the team. Surely against such a further background of change, we need to maintain managerial stability?

[Kloppster]

****ing hell, this is like torture isnt it?

CAn we not hire someone to assasinate the Septics & have done with it?

Please... this is not slagging off spelling. But I'm assuming you mean Sceptics meaning those that are suspicious of something,

because when you say Septics, I just have a vision of swollen pus filled objects -

which of course may be exactly what you meant!



Which reminds me of an old schoolyard joke

What do you call a septic Cat?



...





......


PUSS!

[Skillz]

Please... this is not slagging off spelling. But I'm assuming you mean Sceptics meaning those that are suspicious of something,

because when you say Septics, I just have a vision of swollen pus filled objects -

which of course may be exactly what you meant!



Which reminds me of an old schoolyard joke

What do you call a septic Cat?



...





......


PUSS!

Here's your coat