Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lucas and the evaluation of players performance

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
    The stats which look better due to the high number of simple short passes he plays.

    As someone said earlier, opta stats showed Biscan as having a better passing accuracy rate than Alonso. Shows you how skewed the stats can look.
    Only when you post such a nonsensical comparison, Biscan, unlike Lucas, didn't play and start almost every game.
    www.Liverpoolbaymlt.org

    www.twitter.com/lbmlt

    www.Facebook.com/liverpoolbaymarinelifetrust

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Mattshark View Post
      Or it could be you're wrong Craig.
      Me and about 90% of Liverpool fans. All wrong. Just you who's right. Nobody else.

      Or maybe it could be that not every Liverpool player is the second coming of Pele.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
        Because they play a higher amount of longer, riskier passes that probably dont reach their target. Lucas plays fewer of these.

        You're ignoring the fact that i actually do WATCH the games, and i know what i'm seeing. You acting as if i'm making a judgement based on something other than seeing the matches.

        I couldnt give a **** what a newspaper review says, i base my opinion on what i see.

        Does the 'Guardian game review' say he plays a lot of forward, dangerous balls? Because he doesnt.
        Actually it did. So maybe your judgement is off.

        Don't let those facts get in the way eh Craig .
        www.Liverpoolbaymlt.org

        www.twitter.com/lbmlt

        www.Facebook.com/liverpoolbaymarinelifetrust

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
          Me and about 90% of Liverpool fans. All wrong. Just you who's right. Nobody else.

          Or maybe it could be that not every Liverpool player is the second coming of Pele.
          argumentum ad populum

          Logically fallacy
          www.Liverpoolbaymlt.org

          www.twitter.com/lbmlt

          www.Facebook.com/liverpoolbaymarinelifetrust

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Mattshark View Post
            Actually it did. So maybe your judgement is off.

            Don't let those facts get in the way eh Craig .
            Course it did.

            I dont believe you Matt. You'll say it did and i'll say it didnt.

            Comment


              #36
              Stupid debate, I can't even be arsed reading it all, but Lucas would make a woeful LFC manager.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by Mattshark View Post
                argumentum ad populum

                Logically fallacy
                Fair point there, because you're the only Liverpool fan who is clued up, the rest of us know nothing.

                Seat on that high horse nice and comfy, i bet.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
                  Fair point there, because you're the only Liverpool fan who is clued up, the rest of us know nothing.

                  Seat on that high horse nice and comfy, i bet.
                  Oooh hypocrisy too eh Craig
                  www.Liverpoolbaymlt.org

                  www.twitter.com/lbmlt

                  www.Facebook.com/liverpoolbaymarinelifetrust

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Pablo1981 View Post
                    Stupid debate, I can't even be arsed reading it all, but Lucas would make a woeful LFC manager.
                    www.Liverpoolbaymlt.org

                    www.twitter.com/lbmlt

                    www.Facebook.com/liverpoolbaymarinelifetrust

                    Comment


                      #40
                      So in conclusion, Matt says you're not allowed to have an opinion of what you look for in a very good player, unless Lucas meets the criteria.

                      Comment


                        #41
                        Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
                        Fair point there, because you're the only Liverpool fan who is clued up, the rest of us know nothing.

                        Seat on that high horse nice and comfy, i bet.

                        I dont know, surely yours is higher than anyones. I dont care what facts or stats anyone shows me, I go to the games and I KNOW. I know more than anyone else. Im never wrong.

                        Its all straw men, pedantics and misrepresentation with you mate. You must be a lawyer

                        And I think this was what he meant. Not the 'Guardian game review' you're trying to dismiss by misrepresenting what it is (no change there) but a visual record of the games. With things like players' passes. Not just in number but direction and location. You can look up a random selecion of Lucas' performances and you'll see passes of verying lengths all over the pitch. You can even compare him other players you think (sorry, know) play more accurate and more regular long passes. Have a look. You might learn something.

                        Comment


                          #42
                          Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
                          So in conclusion, Matt says you're not allowed to have an opinion of what you look for in a very good player, unless Lucas meets the criteria.
                          And you can support your opinion with tenuously related statistics.
                          Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom- 2 years 1year 0.5 years

                          Comment


                            #43
                            Originally posted by Operation View Post
                            And you can support your opinion with tenuously related statistics.

                            Comment


                              #44
                              Originally posted by Operation View Post
                              And you can support your opinion with tenuously related statistics.
                              How are they tenuous exactly?
                              www.Liverpoolbaymlt.org

                              www.twitter.com/lbmlt

                              www.Facebook.com/liverpoolbaymarinelifetrust

                              Comment


                                #45
                                Originally posted by Galb View Post
                                I dont know, surely yours is higher than anyones. I dont care what facts or stats anyone shows me, I go to the games and I KNOW. I know more than anyone else. Im never wrong.

                                Its all straw men, pedantics and misrepresentation with you mate. You must be a lawyer

                                And I think this was what he meant. Not the 'Guardian game review' you're trying to dismiss by misrepresenting what it is (no change there) but a visual record of the games. With things like players' passes. Not just in number but direction and location. You can look up a random selecion of Lucas' performances and you'll see passes of verying lengths all over the pitch. You can even compare him other players you think (sorry, know) play more accurate and more regular long passes. Have a look. You might learn something.

                                http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/chalkboards/create
                                Thats an awesome link - thanks for posting
                                K ris90210

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X