Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
The bread tend to hate other dogs they are not familiar with. They are fantastic around children and people and have a great temperament. The words 'savaged' yet it was not seriously injured later on
Yup. Total unfounded bad rep. I've got a staff and he's the happiest, friendliest dog I've owned but the media would have you think that they eat babies for breakfast. Great dogs though.
Dogs are dicks if their owners are dicks. It's environmental.
A lot of people run a race to see who is fastest. I run to see who has the most guts, who can punish himself into exhausting pace, and then at the end, punish himself even more.
Yup. Total unfounded bad rep. I've got a staff and he's the happiest, friendliest dog I've owned but the media would have you think that they eat babies for breakfast. Great dogs though.
Dogs are dicks if their owners are dicks. It's environmental.
70's it was German Shepherd, 80's Doberman, 90's Rottweiler, 00s Pitbulls now Staffs.
The bread tend to hate other dogs they are not familiar with. They are fantastic around children and people and have a great temperament. The words 'savaged' yet it was not seriously injured later on
Loaf it out, Boogs, they're a lovely bread
Jokes aside, I was bitten by one when I was out with my dog. It paid no attention to my dog but brushed past me giving me a nudge and then did it again. I shouted out to the owner to put it on a lead as I knew it was warning me but she didn't. Just drew blood and didn't massively hurt but I've always been frightened of large terriers and it relit my fears
70's it was German Shepherd, 80's Doberman, 90's Rottweiler, 00s Pitbulls now Staffs.
Pitbulls are banned and rightly so. It's in their nature to lock their jaw closed when they bite and there's enough past history to show that even seemingly normal & happy pitbulls can "switch".
I know of one girl who was sat down relaxing when a workmen she had round made a loud noise. It startled her and when she moved suddenly the young pit bull on her lap bit her nose and then her wrist. She stood up screaming and run into the kitchen with the dog still clamped to her wrist.
I'm sure someone could tell me similar tales about other less dangerous dogs, but pitbulls aren't a dog I would have as a family pet.
Statistically Cocker Spaniel is one of the most dangerous breeds. Which just proves how much its about nurture vs nature as they literally make the best pets.
Our other dog is a Doberman cross. Absolute suck. Sits with his nose pressed against the screen door talking to us for attention. Such a dangerous breed.
On the way home from the shops today came across a Rottweiler roaming the streets. Asked a neighbour where it lived, found the house, as a stranger took him in his garden without a single sign of aggression. Again, such a nightmare breed.
Its all bull****. Dogs are dogs. Pitbulls are more likely to maul someone because skinhead knob heads are more likely to own them. It doesn't mean your family pet is more likely to turn than next doors.
I have a funny relationship with dogs. I'm the first person a sucky dog comes to for attention. But I'm also the one that cops it from mean dogs. So a very love / hate relationship and notice no difference from breed to breed.
A good interview with Moreno, he speaks about being angry at the start of the season when he was left out for Gomez, also felt like he didn't quite have Rodgers trust. Also interesting that that training is now much more tactical and more work put in how we setup.
I think Rodgers was at least dangerously close to losing the dressing room. He alienated players such as Enrique, Borini and Balotelli (who are **** I grant you, but it's not good for morale) and leaving out players like Lucas, Sakho and Moreno as well and playing Can and Markovic out of position.
FSG had to act and I'm very pleased they didn't dither over it.
* The above is posted in my opinion. Feel free to disagree.
Agree with that. Gomez was performing better than Moreno so in some respects it was working out well, but it should've been obvious it was a sticking plaster at best and there should have been a plan for getting the best out of Moreno rather than just silently sidelining him as intimated.
Agree with that. Gomez was performing better than Moreno so in some respects it was working out well, but it should've been obvious it was a sticking plaster at best and there should have been a plan for getting the best out of Moreno rather than just silently sidelining him as intimated.
Definitely, I got the feeling as well that Gomez was put there to help out Lovren to an extent at least.
* The above is posted in my opinion. Feel free to disagree.
Agree with that. Gomez was performing better than Moreno so in some respects it was working out well, but it should've been obvious it was a sticking plaster at best and there should have been a plan for getting the best out of Moreno rather than just silently sidelining him as intimated.
I think it was actually looking a decent strategy. It was defence first but I think we did need to tighten up. I think everyone felt that Rodgers main issue was organizing a defense. It is harder to fit an attacking fullback into a system, so the struggles are probably understandable. It is notable Moreno always did better at wingback under Rodgers
The interview makes me wonder if Rodgers bias towards PL proven players was more a bias towards proven English speakers who he could communicate with/train more naturally.
I think fluent can mean different things in different contexts. Klopp for example is clearly pretty fluent in English but when he came said he needed to improve.
In my head my point was partly about group communication - i.e. that a shared language for a unit would help.
I think it was actually looking a decent strategy. It was defence first but I think we did need to tighten up. I think everyone felt that Rodgers main issue was organizing a defense. It is harder to fit an attacking fullback into a system, so the struggles are probably understandable. It is notable Moreno always did better at wingback under Rodgers
The interview makes me wonder if Rodgers bias towards PL proven players was more a bias towards proven English speakers who he could communicate/train more naturally.
Moreno and Sakho were TC signings, maybe there was something in that all along?
* The above is posted in my opinion. Feel free to disagree.
I think fluent can mean different things in different contexts. Klopp for example is clearly pretty fluent in English but when he came said he needed to improve.
In my head my point was partly about group communication - i.e. that a shared language for a unit would help.
I'd wager that Brendan can speak Spanish, but not fluent like a Spaniard.
Brendan Rodgers admitted that his ambition is to manage a club in Spain as the Liverpool boss revealed that he is already learning more Spanish.
Rodgers said in a stunning interview with Spanish newspaper AS that he wants to stay in charge at Anfield for the next 20 years but has already started preparing for a move abroad one day.
The 41-year-old Northern Irishman admitted that he tries to communicate with Liverpool's Spanish players - Jose Enrique, Alberto Moreno, Suso and Javi Manquillo - in their native language, rather than English.
Comment