Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rafa Watch

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
    Keown's ****ing clueless. Bought 77 players, spent £230m yadda yadda

    "Ironical"
    He's paid good money to talk **** like this.

    Are we winning?

    Comment


      A true gent. I miss him
      www.terracehound.com

      Comment


        Going back to Rafa. The interview didn't bring anything that we didn't know already. He still loves the club, the city and there's no question that he isn't Liverpool through and through now. I think he'll be back, he seems to have that driving ambition to put things right and show the doubters what he's really made of, but he'll be careful with his choice of clubs. I only hope he won't be a scourge for us, if he chooses a big club.
        Are we winning?

        Comment


          Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
          Keown's ****ing clueless. Bought 77 players, spent £230m yadda yadda

          "Ironical"
          Er, you're a wordsmith, aren't you?

          But yeah, Keown, like most pundits, hasn't got anything but a very superficial grasp of what has really gone at Liverpool.
          .
          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



          May the Lord bless this post.

          Comment


            England should sack Capello and appoint Rafa

            Comment


              Originally posted by NigelLG View Post
              Going back to Rafa. The interview didn't bring anything that we didn't know already. He still loves the club, the city and there's no question that he isn't Liverpool through and through now. I think he'll be back, he seems to have that driving ambition to put things right and show the doubters what he's really made of, but he'll be careful with his choice of clubs. I only hope he won't be a scourge for us, if he chooses a big club.
              What club is he after? He's clearly on a charm offensive and keen to keep his profile high. So what job does he want?

              Man City? If not, then what?
              .
              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



              May the Lord bless this post.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                What club is he after? He's clearly on a charm offensive and keen to keep his profile high. So what job does he want?

                Man City? If not, then what?
                Dunno, I'd have thought Dan Walker would put that kind of question to him, but no.

                You're an old cynic Neil, romanticism goes out of the window for you.
                Are we winning?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                  Er, you're a wordsmith, aren't you?

                  But yeah, Keown, like most pundits, hasn't got anything but a very superficial grasp of what has really gone at Liverpool.
                  I don't care what the books say, it's a joke of a word used only by clowns. Ironic will always suffice.
                  Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

                  Comment


                    If you're going to be pedantic, it helps to be right.

                    Or, as Keown might say, pedantical.
                    .
                    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                    May the Lord bless this post.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                      If you're going to be pedantic, it helps to be right.

                      Or, as Keown might say, pedantical.
                      I used to say ironical when I was about 8. Then I realised it was ridiculousical.
                      Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
                        I used to say ironical when I was about 8. Then I realised it was ridiculousical.
                        I'm sure it used to be far more common than it is now. It's gone out of fashion. Like racialism.

                        I mean the word racialism, not the Weltanschauung. That's still alive and well and informing speeches made in Germany.

                        Btw I think you mean 'ridiculousistical'.
                        .
                        Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                        May the Lord bless this post.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                          I'm sure it used to be far more common than it is now. It's gone out of fashion. Like racialism.

                          I mean the word racialism, not the Weltanschauung. That's still alive and well and informing speeches made in Germany.

                          Btw I think you mean 'ridiculousistical'.
                          Now that's a word! Interpret that comment in which ever way pleases you the most, Neil.
                          A lot of people run a race to see who is fastest. I run to see who has the most guts, who can punish himself into exhausting pace, and then at the end, punish himself even more.

                          Comment


                            .
                            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                            May the Lord bless this post.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by anfieldanfield View Post
                              I did not say either of those things!

                              Oh, and net spend this window was about 2 million.
                              I was wondering that, but I think to their credit, they were prepared to spend some good amounts, but ended up balancing the books when Torres left.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
                                Keown's ****ing clueless. Bought 77 players, spent £230m yadda yadda

                                "Ironical"
                                Thats a fantastic return 3m on each player. Stats mean nothing Keown

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X