Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Andy Carroll - Best Striker in the World

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by NigelLG View Post
    Don't think it's anything to do with desire, he does try hard. It's more to do with ability (or lack of). He's got some tremendous physical assets () which should be exploited to the full and I'm not talking about his heading and hoofing up the ball to him. As soon as he came onto the pitch last night we started lumping the ball, compared to the tippy tappy **** we graced St. James Park with for the first 20 minutes.
    yeah so have a couple of slags i know and they still try harder than him

    Comment


      Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
      Neezh, you're the worst of the Carroll boo boys.

      :bird:
      I'm pushing it a little to ensure debate is a wee bit acidic.
      Are we winning?

      Comment


        I think he's going to be great.

        When he's playing **** he's still occupying defenders leaving space for Suarez & capable of pinging one in from 25 yards.

        His reaction last night said it all, he knows he has a long way to go. The lad is 22 years old, with the right players around him and a bit of faith from Kenny (both of which he has in abundance) he'll be fine.

        He'll score against Bolton.

        Comment


          Originally posted by ****head View Post
          I'm pushing it a little to ensure debate is a wee bit acidic.
          Not acidic, idiotic.
          .
          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



          May the Lord bless this post.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
            Not acidic, idiotic.
            Don't patronise me Neil.
            Are we winning?

            Comment


              Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
              Not acidic, idiotic.
              Strong words Neil- and unasterisked!
              3rd place. Worst champions ever.

              Comment


                Originally posted by NigelLG View Post
                Don't patronise me Neil.
                Things are as they are. They can be no other.

                Originally posted by PC Plod View Post
                Strong words Neil- and unasterisked!
                Indeed but I feel strongly on this matter. In the moral vacuum of modern society, it is important to make a stand, to call things as they are.

                I contend it is time for our country to take stock. And if anyone has a new iPad, I'm interested.
                .
                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                May the Lord bless this post.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                  Things are as they are. They can be no other.
                  Are we winning?

                  Comment


                    Why is Andy Carroll low on confidence?... maybe he reads this forum.....
                    "If you can't support us when we lose or draw, don't support us when we win." - Bill Shankly

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Sebastian Rooks View Post
                      Why is Andy Carroll low on confidence?... maybe he reads this forum.....


                      He takes to heart everything Nigel says about him.
                      .
                      Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                      May the Lord bless this post.

                      Comment


                        He's a Geordie. I doubt he gives a **** what we think.
                        Modifying post.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Maxiedge View Post
                          I think his rate of improvement over the last 5 years is also a good sign that he can continue to progress this way.

                          Did you not watch the Andy Carroll Story on LFCtv??
                          Yeah, i've seen it. And all that comes out of it was that he was not very good as a youngster, nobody thought he would make it, and then he hit a growth spurt and suddenly became "unplayable".

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Buzzo View Post
                            He's a Geordie. I doubt he gives a **** what we think.


                            In the book I read yesterday (D-list celebrity story-centred review in the Last Book thread), there are several mentions for an Italian cycling journalist by the name of Dino Buzzati. Inevitably I thought of you, Don Buzzo, as I was reading it on the seemingly interminable ferry journey.
                            .
                            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                            May the Lord bless this post.

                            Comment


                              Incidentally Buzzo, I've now taken to pronouncing your username (in my head) as "Butt-so". Like "Fatso" but with a more percussive 't' and the classic Italian vowel sounds, including the relatively short, round 'o'.

                              .
                              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                              May the Lord bless this post.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by PC Plod View Post
                                Trying to reserve judgement.
                                Same here.
                                Member #1 of the Luis Suarez fan club

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X