So where do we go from here? wait for the report and then appeal or can we appeal straight away?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Evra accuses Suarez of racism
Collapse
X
-
not sure if been posted
An Independent Regulatory Commission has today [Tuesday 20 December 2011] found a charge of misconduct against Luis Suarez proven, and have issued a suspension for a period of eight matches as well as fining him £40,000, pending appeal.
On 16 November 2011, The Football Association charged Luis Suarez with misconduct contrary to FA Rule E3 in relation to the Liverpool FC versus Manchester United FC fixture on 15 October 2011.
A hearing took place from 14-20 December 2011 before an Independent Regulatory Commission of The FA to consider the charge.
The Independent Regulatory Commission announced its decision on 20 December 2011, which is as follows:
1.Mr Suarez used insulting words towards Mr Evra during the match contrary to FA Rule E3(1);
2.the insulting words used by Mr Suarez included a reference to Mr Evra's colour within the meaning of Rule E3(2);
3.Mr Suarez shall be warned as to his future conduct, be suspended for eight matches covering all first team competitive matches and fined the sum of £40,000;
4.the [penalty] is suspended pending the outcome of any appeal lodged by Mr Suarez against this decision.
The Independent Regulatory Commission will provide written reasons for its decision in due course setting out:
(a) the findings of fact made by it;
(b) the reasons for its decision finding the charge proved; and
(c) the reasons for the penalty.
Mr Suarez has the right to appeal the decision of the Independent Regulatory Commission to an Appeal Board. An appeal must be lodged within 14 days of the date of the written reasons for the decision.
The penalty is suspended until after the outcome of any appeal, or the time for appealing expires, or should Mr Suarez decide not to appeal. The reason for this is to ensure that the penalty does not take effect before any appeal so that Mr Suarez has an effective right of appeal.
Comment
-
The FA should still investigate itOriginally posted by Alex View PostJust to say, if the CPS find Terry not guilty. I won't have a problem there. The CPS are not as cretinous as the FA
My understanding is that criminal law and FA rules have different criteria to rule guilt on
Criminal law is "beyond reasonable doubt" the FA's rule is "beyond the balance of probabilities"Bob Paisley - "This club has been my life. I'd go out and sweep the street and be proud to do it for Liverpool if they asked me to."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lecter View PostThe FA should still investigate it
My understanding is that criminal law and FA rules have different criteria to rule guilt on
Criminal law is "beyond reasonable doubt" the FA's rule is "beyond the balance of probabilities"
The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
Comment
-
Fixed that for you....Originally posted by Lecter View PostThe FA should still investigate it
My understanding is that criminal law and FA rules have different criteria to rule guilt on
Criminal law is "beyond reasonable doubt" the FA's rule is "Hearsay or if it is to Sir Alex's liking"
YNWA 
Comment
-
terry going to court. hahahaThat's my new book. 'Shut the **** Up, by Dr. Denis Leary'. Patients come in. 'Doctor I-' Shut the **** up! NEXT!! 'Doctor, I've got this-' SHUT THE **** UP!! NEXT! 'He made me feel so much better. He just told me to shut the **** up. Nobody ever told me that before!'
Denis Leary - 1992
Formally known as Carras_boot on ****talk.
Comment
Comment