Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Evra accuses Suarez of racism

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Alex View Post
    So would you rather they either found it straight away, or not at all. Give them a break. At least its being put out there. I don't see how it makes him look bad anyway. Its a 7 year old video. Everyone is wiser now than they were 7 years ago.
    You think it was ok to use the word n****r seven years ago? You think it was considered any less offensive then than now?
    "With Ron Yeats in defence, we could play Arthur Askey in goal."

    Bill Shankly

    Comment


      Am I reading a different report from all these reporters, because i've read through this twice and still cannot see more than 1 mans word against another and Suarez admitting to saying negro.
      Why can't all these reporters see he's been stitched up? And this apology, according to the Mail is for everybody who is offended but not Evra, where did they get that from?
      Liverpool should start banning reporters who write **** about them, Fergie's been doing it for years and getting away with it, we should do the same.
      I really hope Suarez comes back fully rested and puts on a display at old toilet, and Evra gets his comeuppance.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Exiled_red View Post
        If the word 'negro' and other words aren't allowed to be used on a football pitch (as the FA are suggesting) it shouldn't matter what colour the player using them is, they should all be punished in the same way. It would be racist not to...
        Well I woud love to see how the fa would handle a case where one black player referred to another black player as a nigga. It would be a very difficult case for them to deal with.

        Comment


          Originally posted by sssiho View Post
          Am I reading a different report from all these reporters, because i've read through this twice and still cannot see more than 1 mans word against another and Suarez admitting to saying negro.
          Why can't all these reporters see he's been stitched up? And this apology, according to the Mail is for everybody who is offended but not Evra, where did they get that from?
          Liverpool should start banning reporters who write **** about them, Fergie's been doing it for years and getting away with it, we should do the same.
          I really hope Suarez comes back fully rested and puts on a display at old toilet, and Evra gets his comeuppance.
          Because it suits their agenda.
          The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Jack D Rips View Post
            You think it was ok to use the word n****r seven years ago? You think it was considered any less offensive then than now?
            No I don't think its OK to use it 7 years ago. Your missing my point spectacularly. Evra says what he says for whatever reason. As someone said, he can use that word for obvious reasons.

            I don't want to get into a race row anyway. Im not educated enough to do so.
            *Except Michael, who died.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Alex View Post
              No I don't think its OK to use it 7 years ago. Your missing my point spectacularly. Evra says what he says for whatever reason. As someone said, he can use that word for obvious reasons.
              I don't want to get into a race row anyway. Im not educated enough to do so.
              Exactly Alex. I'm black myself so I am speaking from a black persons perspective. Evra will always get away with it.

              Comment


                342. We asked ourselves whether a player with this background would make the comments
                that Mr Evra alleged. We took all these points fully on board and thought long and hard
                about them before finding the Charge proved. We dealt with them in the following way.

                343. Mr Suarez's background as described by him in his statement raised doubts in our minds,
                in the first instance, as to whether he would ever make the alleged comments. We
                recognised that Mr Suarez's background together with the seriousness of the Charge,
                meant that a greater burden of evidence was required to prove the Charge. We formed the
                view that, overall, the preponderance of the evidence favoured the FA's case.

                344. We took into account the fact that it is a real albeit unattractive trait of human nature that
                we all act from time to time, to greater or lesser degrees, in ways which may be out of
                character. This is especially so when we feel under pressure, or challenged, or provoked,
                or pushed into a corner. We do and say things that we are not proud of and regret, and
                that we might try and deny, sometimes even to ourselves. We occasionally do or say
                things that we would be embarrassed to admit to family or friends. It is not inconsistent to
                have black colleagues and friends and relatives, and yet say things to strangers or
                acquaintances about race or colour that we would not say directly to those closer to us.

                345. Bearing these considerations in mind, whilst we were initially doubtful that Mr Suarez
                would make the comments alleged by Mr Evra, we proceeded on the basis that the factors
                relied on in relation to Mr Suarez's background and experiences did not mean that he
                could not or would not act in this way. We weighed these considerations together with all
                the evidence when asking ourselves whose account was more probable.


                Point 344 just beggars belief. They are basically saying that they themselves and indeed everyone are racist.
                "With Ron Yeats in defence, we could play Arthur Askey in goal."

                Bill Shankly

                Comment


                  No they're not. In fact, that's pretty much the opposite of what they're saying. They're arguing that people can say racist things but are not racists.

                  What they have chosen to overlook is that what can be racist to one person might not be perceived that way by another. And as a result they have effectively said one person's set of cultural meanings is superior to someone else's.
                  Last edited by Neil Young; 05-01-12, 11:04 AM.
                  .
                  Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                  May the Lord bless this post.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Alex View Post
                    No I don't think its OK to use it 7 years ago. Your missing my point spectacularly. Evra says what he says for whatever reason. As someone said, he can use that word for obvious reasons.

                    I don't want to get into a race row anyway. Im not educated enough to do so.
                    Disagree strongly with that. The fact that blacks use that word unchecked, assuming no white person could possibly be offended by it's use, yet have a hissy fit when it's used by non-blacks clearly flies in the face of everything that anti-race groups are trying to achieve IMO. Blacks who use that phrase want everyone else to tolerate it's use and recognize the black desire,in using it, to observe it's cultural heritage. A privelage our player seems to have been denied.
                    I have one word to offer - honesty. I couldn't be devious if I tried. Joe Fagan.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Alex View Post
                      No I don't think its OK to use it 7 years ago. Your missing my point spectacularly. Evra says what he says for whatever reason. As someone said, he can use that word for obvious reasons.

                      I don't want to get into a race row anyway. Im not educated enough to do so.
                      Sorry Alex. I wasnt referring to the video in particular. Im not really interested in it anyway. Its quite possible that it is not actually his voice.

                      I was just pointing out that the word n****r was as offensive then as it is now.
                      "With Ron Yeats in defence, we could play Arthur Askey in goal."

                      Bill Shankly

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                        No they're not. In fact, that's pretty much the opposite of what they're saying. They're arguing that people can say racist things but are not racists.

                        What they have chosen to overlook is that what can be racist to one person might not be perceived that way by another. And as a result they have effectively said one person's set of cultural meanings is superior to someone else's.
                        Ok Neil I take that point. I worded it wrong. But it appears to me that they basically say that we are all guilty of the very thing they found Suarez guilty of.
                        "With Ron Yeats in defence, we could play Arthur Askey in goal."

                        Bill Shankly

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by wavydavy View Post
                          Disagree strongly with that. The fact that blacks use that word unchecked, assuming no white person could possibly be offended by it's use, yet have a hissy fit when it's used by non-blacks clearly flies in the face of everything that anti-race groups are trying to achieve IMO. Blacks who use that phrase want everyone else to tolerate it's use and recognize the black desire,in using it, to observe it's cultural heritage. A privelage our player seems to have been denied.
                          It's a terrible word and I've never bought into this whole 'reclaiming' thing.

                          Someone said the other day one of the last words Stephen Lawrence heard, possibly the very last, before being murdered was "******". Try telling his family that it's okay in some circumstances.
                          Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by wavydavy View Post
                            Disagree strongly with that. The fact that blacks use that word unchecked, assuming no white person could possibly be offended by it's use, yet have a hissy fit when it's used by non-blacks clearly flies in the face of everything that anti-race groups are trying to achieve IMO. Blacks who use that phrase want everyone else to tolerate it's use and recognize the black desire,in using it, to observe it's cultural heritage. A privelage our player seems to have been denied.
                            Whether you agree or not it will always be the case where many black people will openly use the word nigga to refer to each other but will not tollerate white people using the word. I think you would have to be pretty damn naive and ignorant if you don't understand why they would never tollerate white people using it.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
                              It's a terrible word and I've never bought into this whole 'reclaiming' thing.

                              Someone said the other day one of the last words Stephen Lawrence heard, possibly the very last, before being murdered was "******". Try telling his family that it's okay in some circumstances.
                              Hmm. So opinion among black people is divided on it. But I'm really not sure that it's remotely significant whether a white person "buys into it" or not.
                              .
                              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                              May the Lord bless this post.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
                                It's a terrible word and I've never bought into this whole 'reclaiming' thing.

                                Someone said the other day one of the last words Stephen Lawrence heard, possibly the very last, before being murdered was "******". Try telling his family that it's okay in some circumstances.
                                I've never bought into the reclaiming thing either but no disrespect Shaggy as a white person you'll never fully understand the whole reclaiming thing anyway. Don't take offence mate.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X