Skrtel is #37. You mean Agger.
-
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post. -
so i do...Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
removing all the weak links makes us stronger
too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all.Comment
-
But Skrtel didn't play against Hearts.
You're all over the place.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
If we play like that next week we will smash Arsenal IMOComment
-
I almost wish the match was at The Emirates next week. The Arsenal fans are pissed and ready to turn on Wenger I reckon. If we started well next week the boo boys would soon appear
I agree we have a good chance against them (if we cut out the silly errors), but they've still got plenty of class so we'd be foolish to write them off.Comment
-
Agreed, they wont be able to cope with that. Mind you they couldnt last season, we absolutely pulverised them in one of the most dominant performances I've seen at Anfield. And we lost!! The one man team has gone now though.Originally posted by Leyton388 View PostComment
-
Originally posted by Chris View Post
There is the reason right there. I watched Arsenal today and they have very little threat up top. RVP was the reason the finished in the top 4 last season and also with Song gone and their summer singings being piss poor they are there for the taking.
Don't get me wrong i will not write them off as that would be stupid but like i said if we play like that against them we will overrun them all over the pitch.Comment
-
got up too early to watch the gameOriginally posted by Neil Young View PostBut Skrtel didn't play against Hearts.
You're all over the place.
managed to re-consider my post and then remove the error, but you were **** hot
but anyways...
removing all the weak links makes us stronger
too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all.Comment
-
midfield conundrum...
lucas out injured in the warm up... panic... no.
allen drops back to cover. no probs. who would have thought it, eh
i think sahin will offer us more going forward. crosses, through balls, one two's, some goals even. he is better going forward than allen or lucas.
i would say that we should be playing lucas or allen as the defensive midfield.
this would allow us to play gerrard and sahin as the attacking midfielders. maybe have shelvey as a spare for gerrard.
-----back------ four-----
-----allen or lucas-------
--gerrard/shelvey----sahin--removing all the weak links makes us stronger
too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all.Comment
-
Originally posted by baitman View Postgot up too early to watch the game
managed to re-consider my post and then remove the error, but you were **** hot
but anyways...
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
downing at LB...
as we have seen, he cannot tackle... how could he ever do any defensive duties.
glen johnson at RB...
he can defend, but loves to bomb forward as a wing back to support the attack. this left him badly out of position in the arsenal game, and no one came across to cover. there is no doubting that he can defend, and he can attack.
but can he do both at the same time...
maybe we could play him on the right and get the best of his attacking skills, but without compromising our defence too much?
this wing back, attacking full back thing... we cannot keep getting away with it, unless we have more brains on the pitch.removing all the weak links makes us stronger
too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all.Comment
-
Regarding Johnson being out of position, as mentioned at inordinate length in the newly-profound
MOTD analysis (or was it Sky? I forget), maybe this is the sort of thing that takes time to implement. Johnson needs to learn when and how far to go forward, other players need to learn how to cover him when he does and all this needs to become almost instinctive. Surely it's obvious that is going to take time.
...Or else the intended pattern of play is a sham and Rodgers doesn't know what he's doing, either because the players can never learn to implement what he wants or because it's a flawed approach..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
allen is a little cracker. he breaks up play, always happy to take the ball, makes himself available for a pass, doesnt go missing. he keeps the midfield ticking over really well.
what is lacking in our play is some penetration from midfield.
i dont think that allen is the player to do this. moving him further up the pitch will compromise how he intercepts the other team, which will be vital to us.
maybe gerrard on the right and sahin on the left might give us a little more grit in the advanced midfield area.
------back four------
-------allen---------
--gerrard --- sahin--
----front three----
or maybe we are a little too top heavy and we get out gunned in the middle...
maybe more solid in midfield, with more running and penetration from;
--------back four--------
---------allen-----------
shelvey--gerrard--sahin--
-------front two-------
removing all the weak links makes us stronger
too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all.Comment
-
I like that second form. That is kind of like how City play...96 Never ForgottenComment
-
I think we'll be mostly trying to play a midfield triangle with two at the back until Lucas is back. None of the available CMs can really do the deep job on their own but Allen and Gerrard can I feel work together to give a lot of midfield control. The issue is getting Gerrard to judge his balance of long balls to simple passes or runs forward better."The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
-- William BlakeComment
Comment