Originally posted by Neil Young
View Post
-
I think the bigger mistake is for the clubs owner to continuously hang decent managers out to dry, never saying anything to back them, and never attempting to use his influence to pull certain players and fans into line more, because he's the one person they wont turn on and who can do no wrong. -
Chelsea supporters can boo as loudly as they like on Saturday — they’ve paid their money after all. But the first thing to say is that pretty much everything Rafa Benitez said was right.
He was undermined at Chelsea from day one by the bizarre decision to invite him to take charge, only to chop his legs away with the title of Interim Manager.
Benitez said it was a ‘massive mistake’. So did we all.
The Spaniard’s complaint that a section of supporters have created a toxic atmosphere at the club is also correct. Whether it actively undermines the performance of the team is a matter of debate, but the jeers, banners and mood of seething animosity generated certainly cannot help.
At best, they are a distraction; at worst, a huge disincentive.
Yet Benitez was described as having set off on an ‘uncontrolled rant’ in midweek for repeating what every observer, journalist and objective fan has been saying since he walked through the door.
It wasn’t some wild tirade. It was a carefully measured two fingers aimed at the idiocy of his situation. But the resulting ire of some Chelsea supporters is just as illogical as much of what has happened at Stamford Bridge this season.
The fans slaughtering Benitez appear to be strangely unhappy he has noticed their abuse and reacted to it. Funnier still, they seem offended he is offended by their efforts to offend him, I think. It’s all a bit confusing. So the stadium will boil with self-righteous indignation from fans scorning their manager, and they will call for the dismissal of a man who has already said it’s ‘a waste of time’ as he is leaving soon anyway, which essentially proves his point.
For some his departure cannot come soon enough, but what would Chelsea really gain by removing Benitez now? If owner Roman Abramovich makes another change, the likelihood is he will replace his caretaker with that regular nigh****chman and part-time Nosferatu stunt double, Avram Grant. How is that any better?
Benitez is right about something else, too. Many decisions taken at Chelsea of late have been nothing less than ‘massive mistakes’. Add to that some horribly damaging race rows and strange sackings.
The only certainty is Abramovich will walk into the Chelsea boardroom any day now and announce: ‘I’ve changed my mind.’
The reply should be: ‘Will it work any better this time?’, or at least it would be if the assembled suits had any sense or balls. Abramovich is always changing his mind, and the workings of the owner’s brain are a constant subject of speculation.
He stares out from the back of his executive box, rarely betraying emotion, unless it is to hail a performance by (former) striker Fernando Torres, the £50million albatross he has hung around the neck of a succession of bosses.
Usually, Abramovich wears his trademark Forrest Gump expression, seemingly clinging to the belief that football ‘is like a box of chocolates. You never know what you’re gonna get’.
Whatever it is, you can be pretty sure he will bite half off, spit it out and put the rest back, hoping no-one notices if he buys an even more expensive selection next time.
But the fans hankering for the return of Jose Mourinho or Roberto Di Matteo appear to forget who fired those managers in the first place. Their memory also blots out the fact that Abramovich put the Spanish boss they despise so much where he is now.
Andre Villas-Boas was another who wasn’t considered capable enough. The young tyro dared to threaten the old guard at the club and was hounded out by that cabal and many of the supporters haranguing Benitez now.
But having been betrayed by Abramovich’s decision to cave in to their demands, I’m sure that AVB is thoroughly enjoying his tussle with Chelsea for a Champions League place right now.
So who is next? Gus Poyet has been mentioned, Gianfranco Zola, too. Ray Wilkins is even in the betting, the same Wilkins that mystifyingly was fired by the club without warning in November 2010. Mourinho, as ever, is on the list. He makes sure of that. But why not just give the job to John Terry. ‘Captain, leader, legend’ says the banner. Let’s see what he’s made of?
Terry is reportedly the man fronting up to Benitez on the training ground, or urging the club to extend the contracts of other players on the books, or being cast as the man who ‘runs the dressing room’, the character any incoming boss needs to get onside if he wants to survive.
One adoring internet fan page describes Terry as: ‘The man who bleeds blue, the man who is a walking-talking symbol of the club itself — Mr. Chelsea.’
Why not try him? Let’s see how the dressing-room politics work then when Terry’s in direct contact with Abramovich about his own job, rather than someone else’s. Let’s see how long Mr Chelsea’s marriage lasts.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/foo...#ixzz2MOW5x9uE
Comment
-
A banner reads: 'Rafa Benitez - We're Just Not That In Ter Im', which I thought wasn't *too* bad for Chelsea fans, ignoring the fact they're a set of cuntflaps and the very reason why it's there in the first place. And then they follow it up with 'The Interim One' and normality is resumed.Comment
-
"Individual players have spoken with Benitez about his training methods and tactics."
He's got Chelsea kicked out of the Champions League and made them even more of a laughing stock than they were before. Brilliant tactics if you ask me.Rome wasn't built in a day, but it wasn't built by the apprentice either.Comment
-
I wouldn't argue with that but I suppose I was suggesting that Rafa hasn't handled everything brilliantly. Then again he didn't handle the "Rafa rant"Originally posted by Vermilion View Post
perfectly either.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
I think "The Interim One" is quite witty.Originally posted by Muddled View Post.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Ummm they were already out of the champions league when he took over!Originally posted by Shackanory View PostComment
-
I think the biggest problem at Chelsea for Rafa is the players like Terry trying to do what they did to Villas-Boas and Rafa not taking it.
I love that he benches Terry, it's probably better for their cause.The times they are a changin'.Comment
-
Chelsea captain John Terry in his programme notes: "We all want to thank the fans for their great support in travelling to Middlesbrough
... and not getting back until 4am. That doesn't go unnoticed by us." #bbcfootballComment
-
-
Originally posted by Gibbo View Post.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
I look like i'm getting ready to come on.
Gamechanger
The times they are a changin'.Comment
-
I thought it was too obvious. Would it sway your opinion if it was cut out and pasted onto a cardboard box?Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
Like so:
Comment
-
They have the worst banners in world football.Comment
-
Comment