Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
Carra and Skrtel do not work as a pairing. They are too similar, and Agger provides some composure and power in the air, as well as balance on the left.
Whenever Carra has played with Skrtel, we have looked shakey. All this proves is some exfootballers dont know **** about tactics or players.
In the beginning, Fowler created the Heaven and the Earth.
TBF, that is why Kenny is our manager and Wright is a 3 times failure at managing Chester City
The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
We have the best defence in the league. Agger and Skrtel have been excellent since they've started playing together.
It's a typical lower league/Hodgson attitude isn't it - having a defender who can actually play football is some how seen as a bad thing. Totally ridiculous.
Even if it weren't true now that Agger and Skrtel was our best partnership you have to prepare for the future and that certain involves less Carragher.
Carra and Skrtel do not work as a pairing. They are too similar, and Agger provides some composure and power in the air, as well as balance on the left.
Whenever Carra has played with Skrtel, we have looked shakey. All this proves is some exfootballers dont know **** about tactics or players.
Correct me if I a wrong but I seem to remember Carra and Skirtel having one of the best defensive records in world football a couple of seasons back
Anybody who criticizes Klopp ever is a James Blunt. Nov 2015 #****CITY
They didnt look to bad when we were challenging for the title or winning away to Real Madrid. I think the problem is Carra has slipped badly over the last few years so it obviously looks **** now but they could play together comfortably as they are/were both very good defenders.
His name is actually K a n w a r but someone put a filter on here to replace it with Kuntwar
Ha ha, I was wondering what the joke was. I was pretty drunk when posting and was afraid to ask for fear that the whole article was a spoof and I had just been Kurt Angled.
If we are all only happy when we are really winning in the end, when your race finishes, what life would that be?
the back 4 should be as it is, it's defending really well at present and there's no reason to change it.
Sorry Carra but you're 3rd choice now.
The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
It's a typical lower league/Hodgson attitude isn't it - have a defender who can actually play football is some how seen as a bad thing. Totally ridiculous.
Even if it weren't true now that Agger and Skrtel was our best partnership you have to prepare for the future and that certain involves less Carragher.
Wright is wrong.
It's a little ironic in that he himself wasn't too bad on the ball. But I suppose people like Hoddle have already proved that a crap manager is a crap manager, no matter what kind of player he was.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Comment