Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Raheem Sterling

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by EwarWoo View Post
    Jesus ****ing Christ. Can't believe how many posts on this since last night. You lot can't half throw a mardy pity party.

    Is it based on fact yet or still just speculation?
    Errrr you seen the interview that come out today?
    Always borrow money from a pessimist. He won’t expect it back. Oscar Wilde

    Comment


      Basic gist of it being it's not about the money he just wants to focus on the football for now and sort it in the summer? Is that the basic gist?

      Comment


        That's the spirit!
        Experimental music, Metropolitan foodstuffs, Mexican wrestler art, London suburbia, wry whimsy, fansy pants flim flam lad

        Comment


          Raheem Sterling

          Originally posted by Leyton388 View Post
          I can see it now. The club will sell Sterling in the summer and be right on the phone to Southampton and West Brom.

          It's going to be a carbon copy of last summer. Aiming to win the best of the rest competition. *getting top 4*. Is unfortunately the acceptable aim of this football club nowadays and for the people who run it.
          And once we get in the competition we cant wait to get out of it.

          Bit melodramatic?

          Especially the last bit - it's work in progress with us, like it or not we will accept ridiculous offers for our best players cos it speeds up The Big Plan each time we do it.

          Wouldn't surprise me if we're thinking about the tribunal route if it exists. A few scenarios:

          - He signs a contract at ÂŁ180k and gets sold in 2 years. He might go for ÂŁ50m. We'd be spending maybe ÂŁ20m in wages/signing-on fee, we get one of the league's best attackers for 2 seasons and a net profit of ÂŁ30m at the end to reinvest. Sets a huge precedent and messes up the wage structure.

          - Sell now, get ÂŁ50m and reinvest in 2 players (average ÂŁ20m each & ÂŁ5m wages) - law of averages says one succeeds and one doesn't, so team-wise we should be about where we are now, might improve but the risk is we go backward.

          - Run his contract down, we get to keep one of the league's best attackers and after 2 years we've spent ÂŁ3m on wages. Tribunal sets fee (?) and we're in profit (min ÂŁ40m?). Sterling plays amazingly for us in this period because he won't get his move otherwise. We reinvest the tribunal money with our wage structure and pride intact.

          The more I think about it, and knowing what we do about FSG - ruthless lateral thinkers who can keep a poker face - the more I believe the last option could be the best for LFC. The pros outweigh the cons as far as I can tell. I think the problem with Sterling is he'll be England's best player soon and you pay a premium for signing that no matter how good he is now.

          Personally I reckon we should stick a ÂŁ100m release clause in front of him with ÂŁ150k a week and tell him to earn his move as fast as he wants it.

          Last edited by Fivex; 02-04-15, 01:19 AM.
          Hello mert.

          Comment


            And you can do a compare and analysis of our two avatars to highlight the incongruity between your view of footballers' motivations and mine.
            Experimental music, Metropolitan foodstuffs, Mexican wrestler art, London suburbia, wry whimsy, fansy pants flim flam lad

            Comment


              i wonder if sterling and his agent are being coached through this process of separating himself from Liverpool, seeming to go out on a limb with the interview, might be being engineered by maureen. smells like his work.

              tell them you want to win things, lets see where we are at the end of the season, yada...
              the cheaper he can get sterling for then the more they will offer him per week.
              removing all the weak links makes us stronger

              too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all.

              Comment


                I think by giving an unauthorised interview he’s stepped over a line. What I took from that interview is two clear messages, don’t play me at RB and Sign some players, then I might sign. This was always going to happen with Raheem. Its not so long ago he was testing boundaries and Bdog gave him quite the dressing down in that Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous Anfield Edition show, sponsored by Harley Davidson and Miracle Grow for Men.

                The timing of all this is designed to exert maximum pressure, Jordan Ibe injured, Sturridge injured, Gerrard banned, Sterling is definitely at this moment in time perceived as the most dangerous player on the pitch with the exception of perhaps Coutinho. As far as I can see the club has only one option, hardball.
                Offer him a contract, which is fair, put a large, realise clause in it and try to push the club on. If he does not sign, keep him at the club for another year, play Jordan Ibe increasingly more and watch his stock plummet. What ever happens we, as a club need to be both leading and also send a message to agents. I would not do business with his agent again, if at all possible.

                If we had options I would also be tempted to bench him or drop him from the team altogether. But alas I think we are too thin with injuries and bans to even consider it. It’s all so bloody predictable and disappointing. If he does play at the weekend, if he knows what’s good for him he better play an absolute blinder or he’s going to get both barrels all week. Oh and yeah YNWA except if you drag you heels publically on contract negotiations then you talk a long walk off a short bridge
                Anybody who criticizes Klopp ever is a James Blunt. Nov 2015
                #****CITY

                Comment


                  That interview is the very definition of being badly advised.

                  Basically Sterling has just turned all the grief away from the club and onto himself, confirmed we'd offered to treble his wages to 100k a week, confirmed he turned it down and also said it's not about money.
                  Well unless he signs in the summer for less that statement will always be used against him

                  Not sure what more lfc could have done?
                  We were never going to renegotiate last year, 1 year after his last contract so all that is bollocks.
                  The King was back for a short while. Long live The King.

                  Comment


                    An unauthorized interview? Since when do players need authorization to give interviews?

                    Comment


                      Good Morning Idiot i mean Raheem....see what kind of **** storm you have created in the media this Morning,your 20 years old you should be focusing on nothing but the development of your career and how Brendan Rodgers and LFC have been good for you.

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by EwarWoo View Post
                        An unauthorized interview? Since when do players need authorization to give interviews?
                        ok so he says he wants to get his head down and just concentrate on football and not discuss anything till the summer,then why open your potty mouth and give an interview.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Bender View Post
                          ok so he says he wants to get his head down and just concentrate on football and not discuss anything till the summer,then why open your potty mouth and give an interview.
                          ... about considering what's best for his future because all he wants to do is win trophies.
                          https://www.needlesandgrooves.com/

                          https://twitter.com/NeedlesNGrooves

                          Comment


                            Storm in a teacup really.

                            I hate this side of modern day football though. Players salaries and social lives are discussed infinitely more than their performances on the pitch. It's all such bollocks

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by EwarWoo View Post
                              An unauthorized interview? Since when do players need authorization to give interviews?
                              I am pretty sure the Club has media policy for its players, they cannot just give interviews when and with who they like, it would be bloody chaos if they did
                              Anybody who criticizes Klopp ever is a James Blunt. Nov 2015
                              #****CITY

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by False9 View Post
                                I am pretty sure the Club has media policy
                                So basically you're guessing?

                                I know, media policy, we'll get him on that!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X