Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Disagree on Adam and Carroll. They have been alright.
To be honest Adam is the player I'm most worried about. We're losing the midfield battle too often, we need a central midfield that can dominate the game and dictate play. Adam goes missing far too often and in my opinion lacks the ability and quality to dominate the midfield for long periods of the game.
If we get control of the midfield and dictate the play the more attacking players (strikers and wide players) will also have more influence on the game.
The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
To be honest Adam is the player I'm most worried about. We're losing the midfield battle too often, we need a central midfield that can dominate the game and dictate play. Adam goes missing far too often and in my opinion lacks the ability and quality to dominate the midfield for long periods of the game.
If we get control of the midfield and dictate the play the more attacking players (strikers and wide players) will also have more influence on the game.
Yep. As long as Adam starts our midfield will get dominated. He isn't good enough for a club with top 4 aspirations.
To be honest Adam is the player I'm most worried about. We're losing the midfield battle too often, we need a central midfield that can dominate the game and dictate play. Adam goes missing far too often and in my opinion lacks the ability and quality to dominate the midfield for long periods of the game.
If we get control of the midfield and dictate the play the more attacking players (strikers and wide players) will also have more influence on the game.
Thats a different debate altogether though. I was pointing out that they hadnt been as bad as people were making out.
Presteige friendly though. Im sure Uraguay put more emphasis on there national team. Especially as they are the South American Champions. They want there talisman there and to show they can compete on the world stage.
Agree that Maxi is not the answer in terms of scoring goals. The point I was trying to make is that the last season under Dalglish I believe we scored lots of goals because we were playing pass and move football and using a fluid, modern 4231 formation. Players like Maxi, Spearing and Bellamy are suited to pass and move football but for some reason our manager believes that a rigid 442 is the way forward despite all the evidence to the contrary.
I'd like to see a stat comparison between last season (under Kenny) and this
In terms of chances created, shots, shots on target
I bet you there is little or no difference in the amount of chances we are creating / shots
The crucial difference is finishing
So really if we are creating the same number of chances/shots under 4-4-2 as we were under 4-2-3-1 I dont see how changing the formation is going to get us better results
The problem is in finishing those chances - its **** all to do with formations/players etc...
We are creating chances and players are missing those chances (that last season the same players might have been taking)
Bob Paisley - "This club has been my life. I'd go out and sweep the street and be proud to do it for Liverpool if they asked me to."
Yep. As long as Adam starts our midfield will get dominated. He isn't good enough for a club with top 4 aspirations.
Dominated infers the midfield is being overrun all through games which absolutely isnt true
The only game that has happened was Spurs, and that imo was down to Parker who did a number on our midfield last season also (when at West Ham) and that central midfield didnt include Adam
Yes Norwich, Swansea have had periods in games when they have done well but you'd expect that
People are reading and imo creating way too much with this Adam thing
The simple thing is the team hasnt been doing too badly in ANY department except finishing
Bob Paisley - "This club has been my life. I'd go out and sweep the street and be proud to do it for Liverpool if they asked me to."
Comment