Originally posted by RedReet
View Post
Think the difference would be that Bradley's game would change when targeted (as we saw it did and as it did in other games when he was targeted and then he would drop a bit deeper to counter it) whereas we have seen this season and last season that TAA stays up in a more advanced position even after being targeted.
Think the biggest issue with TAA playing in the inverted role is his positional play. He just seems to have stopped reading the game well when the other team has the ball and gets caught out of position a lot as a result.
And it is not something I think was always a flaw in him as when he was playing as an attacking RB that would go forward down the right flank he looked more like Bradley does now just with a far greater offensive output.
I have never bought into TAA being a poor defender as he showed many many times as a RB that was simply untrue, but as a midfielder I think his positional/spatial awareness is poor and the more disciplined side of that position does not suit his skillset/style of play.
For me it is pretty simple when it comes to TAA. As an attacking RB he is world class. As a playmaking midfielder he is decent to good but not top class as he has as many games where he looks bang average in the role as he does ones where he looks really good.
He was a bit of a stat unicorn when used as an attacking RB, that changed when he inverted last season and again this season. His stats used to be slightly better than Hakimi as an attacking RB, now whilst Hakimi's are still in unicorn mode, TAA's have dropped off in a number of metrics.

The midfield upgrade is the key difference.
, and Alphonso Davies (yeah gazzumping any move he has lined up with Real
) for LB using some of the 150m we got for TAA going to Real and we then rule the PL and CL.
Comment