Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
He should have gone in the summer but he cannot be sacked after 6 league games. We have spent a lot of money in the summer and he needs a bit more time to gel the players into a team.
The time to sack Rodgers was after the 6-1, it isn't now.
The time was then and the time is now. You can't tell me you think he will turn it around. Because the only point to him staying is if we believe he will be the best man for the next two years or more.
No way he starts as manager next season. And if that is the case why delay?
He should have gone in the summer but he cannot be sacked after 6 league games. We have spent a lot of money in the summer and he needs a bit more time to gel the players into a team.
The time to sack Rodgers was after the 6-1, it isn't now.
We made a massive mistake in the summer. If we do nothing now we are just compounding that mistake.
He should have gone in the summer but he cannot be sacked after 6 league games. We have spent a lot of money in the summer and he needs a bit more time to gel the players into a team.
The time to sack Rodgers was after the 6-1, it isn't now.
Why does Liverpool need more time to gel their signings than any other club? If you have a raft of new signings, keep things simple, don't chop and change formations and complicate things. Had to work so I didn't see the game, but I presume he used three at the back which for me is reason enough to sack him two times.
* The above is posted in my opinion. Feel free to disagree.
Rodgers had plenty of excuses last season. We all agreed he had no more excuses and to get the team performing this season. It's clear as day that he can not turn it around even this early. It's a shame, but he has to go before this season becomes a waste.
Why does Liverpool need more time to gel their signings than any other club? If you have a raft of new signings, keep things simple, don't chop and change formations and complicate things. Had to work so I didn't see the game, but I presume he used three at the back which for me is reason enough to sack him two times.
Look at Leicester City this season . New manager, New signings and they look like a team already. Leicester City have a better manager than we do
I think we as fans are over-analyzing everything he says.
What do people want him to say, negative words and phrases??
I'm not defending him as I want him gone but it's literally every ****ing thing he says now gets picked up and analyzed.
Who cares what he says, he is who he is we all know he chats ****e but one thing he does come across is even if it is bollocks is that he's positive and we can't ask for more than that as a manager.
I'm sure he knows better than any one of us that we're ****e and he has to change that but I don't really know what else he can say.
Klopp on LFC vs MUFC (March 9th 2016) - "This is why I love football. This is why we watched it when we were young. I can still not have enough of it."
Always, keep your face to the sun, and shadows will fall behind you.
I think letting someone spend 80m in the summer to then sack him after 6 league games makes no sense.
If fsg were so divided on Rodgers why was he allowed to buy all the players he wanted. If last season wasn't enough to convince Fenway to get rid of him then I don't think that the first 6 league games of this season are either.
The rot has been there for ages, for months. The time to act has passed. He needs at least 10 games to prove beyond all doubt that he's totally out of his depth. That's what Fenway are looking for and were not there yet.
[B]Sir Isaac Newton knew the universal law of karma - any action has its equal and opposite reaction.[B]
I think letting someone spend 80m in the summer to then sack him after 6 league games makes no sense.
If fsg were so divided on Rodgers why was he allowed to buy all the players he wanted. If last season wasn't enough to convince Fenway to get rid of him then I don't think that the first 6 league games of this season are either.
The rot has been there for ages, for months. The time to act has passed. He needs at least 10 games to prove beyond all doubt that he's totally out of his depth. That's what Fenway are looking for and were not there yet.
Do you think he's good enough to manage this club? I'm not having a go if that's what you think, just want to know your opinion.
To me, when you realise something isn't working and you don't have confidence it will change, you have to be ballsy and make a big decision.
West Ham bosses got stick for ditching Allardyce in the summer who "guaranteed them premier league football". Leicester got stick for sacking Pearson who kept them up so well. Southampton got rid of Nigel Adkins mid season who wasn't even in too much trouble and had won them two promotions.
Now I don't think we will be relegated. But I don't think under Rodgers we will finish top 4. I doubt we will even if we change manager, but at least it gives us a chance. If we leave it until we can say we've given him 10 games, by then 4th will be long gone.
Comment